<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed version="0.3" xmlns="http://purl.org/atom/ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xml:lang="en">
<title>Open Source Weblog</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.businessreviewonline.com/os/" />
<modified>2008-04-30T17:25:03Z</modified>
<tagline></tagline>
<id>tag:www.businessreviewonline.com,2008:/os//4</id>
<generator url="http://www.movabletype.org/" version="3.17">Movable Type</generator>
<copyright>Copyright (c) 2008, Jason Stamper</copyright>
<entry>
<title>Could your next mortgage be from Microsoft or BT?</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.businessreviewonline.com/os/archives/2008/04/index.html#000658" />
<modified>2008-04-30T17:25:03Z</modified>
<issued>2008-04-30T17:20:43Z</issued>
<id>tag:www.businessreviewonline.com,2008:/os//4.658</id>
<created>2008-04-30T17:20:43Z</created>
<summary type="text/plain">What with the credit crunch looking like it may turn into a full-blown recession, it occurs to me that it would be a good time for Microsoft, IBM, or even Novell to get into the finance business. OK, so Microsoft already is in some respects (any company with over $14bn in short term investments needs to have some idea about finance) but it&apos;s really an IT company. Why would it want to offer loans, or mortgages, or other financial products? Well you might ask. You may also ask why BT is already offering its own credit card in the UK,...</summary>
<author>
<name>Jason Stamper</name>

<email>jstamper@datamonitor.com</email>
</author>

<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.businessreviewonline.com/os/">
<![CDATA[<p>What with the credit crunch looking like it may turn into a full-blown recession, it occurs to me that it would be a good time for Microsoft, IBM, or even Novell to get into the finance business.</p>

<p>OK, so Microsoft already is in some respects (any company with over $14bn in short term investments needs to have some idea about finance) but it's really an IT company. Why would it want to offer loans, or mortgages, or other financial products?</p>

<p>Well you might ask. You may also ask why BT is already offering its own credit card in the UK, to both BT and non BT customers. </p>

<p>With many of the banks finding it harder and harder to borrow the money to offer attractive interest rates to loan, mortgage and credit card customers, companies (like BT, Microsoft, IBM et al) have an opportunity to step in and do some lending of their own.</p>

<p>Not only do they have huge cash reserves (Microsoft has over $11bn in cash in hand) but the cash-generative nature of their businesses, and the fact that they are household names, gives them considerable credibility in the eyes of consumers. </p>

<p>With the kind of trouble that Northern Rock faced in the UK recently showing that even long-established banks could find themselves in trouble in these challenging times, there are plenty of customers who would feel safer taking out a mortgage with Microsoft than certain banking institutions....</p>]]>
<![CDATA[<p>...Better still, Microsoft even has a range of technologies (like Windows CardSpace) that it could presumably put into action to underpin financial products and services of its own. In fact it would become one of its own larger customers as it consumed vast amounts of processing power to support its own financial platform.</p>

<p>Any reason why this won't happen? Maybe. </p>

<p>Microsoft's shareholders may be none too pleased to see it make such a move: they invested in a high tech company, not a bank. Focus: Microsoft is focused on IT challenges, not banking. </p>

<p>Risk: Microsoft isn't in danger of running short of cash, but a percentage of loans always default, so it may consider it safer to invest its cash in other ways. Brand and customer satisfaction: nobody likes the company that charges them a huge fee for exceeding their credit limit, or missing a minimum payment. Then again, nobody likes a blue screen of death, either.</p>

<p>But on balance, I'm still not sure the idea hasn't crossed Bill and Steve's minds.</p>]]>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>SnapLogic claims really simple (open source) integration</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.businessreviewonline.com/os/archives/2008/04/index.html#000655" />
<modified>2008-04-25T11:01:20Z</modified>
<issued>2008-04-23T15:49:41Z</issued>
<id>tag:www.businessreviewonline.com,2008:/os//4.655</id>
<created>2008-04-23T15:49:41Z</created>
<summary type="text/plain">Integrating disparate data, applications and systems is a challenge that has made companies like Tibco and Informatica rich. There’s good reason for that – it’s a difficult task, not made any easier by the fact that the artefacts that you are trying to integrate are in constant flux as new versions of applications, systems and even standards are constantly changing. But open source firm SnapLogic, founded in 2006 by the former CEO of Informatica Gaurav Dhillon, says it can not only enable what it has trademarked as ‘Really Simple Integration’, but also do it open source......</summary>
<author>
<name>Jason Stamper</name>

<email>jstamper@datamonitor.com</email>
</author>

<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.businessreviewonline.com/os/">
<![CDATA[<p>Integrating disparate data, applications and systems is a challenge that has made companies like Tibco and Informatica rich. There’s good reason for that – it’s a difficult task, not made any easier by the fact that the artefacts that you are trying to integrate are in constant flux as new versions of applications, systems and even standards are constantly changing.</p>

<p>But open source firm SnapLogic, founded in 2006 by the former CEO of Informatica Gaurav Dhillon, says it can not only enable what it has trademarked as ‘Really Simple Integration’, but also do it open source...</p>

<p><br />
</p>]]>
<![CDATA[<p>SnapLogic has two versions of its data integration framework – Community Edition 2.0 and Professional Edition 2.0.  SnapLogic Community Edition 2.0 is available now, free of charge, and licensed under GPLv2; SnapLogic Professional Edition 2.0 is available under a commercial license which includes technical support. </p>

<p>When CBR caught up with SnapLogic CEO Chris Marino, he said that Dhillon founded the company after he realised that for many companies, what they needed was a relatively lightweight, economical solution to the integration challenge: “He [Dhillon] realised that there were situations where answers like Informatica were not being used because companies could not afford the training and technology – it would be like swatting a fly with a sledgehammer.”</p>

<p>“With SnapLogic’s ‘Really Simple Integration’ we’re bringing the benefits to data integration that RSS [really simple syndication] did for information,” says Marino.</p>

<p>The company’s approach apparently makes it possible to integrate data, create mashups and Rich Internet Applications (or RIAs) by accessing data sources through a simple URL that points to the data’s original location.</p>

<p>“We can help people traditionally at the edge of IT – business people – to move at the speed of developers,” says Marino. “Our approach with URLs means it can give access to, or enable the mashup of, sources as diverse as SEC filings, hosted assets like web pages on Yahoo or any other Web source.”</p>

<p>Access to other back-end sources is typically handled via Jython, the Java scripting language, or ODBC in the case of databases. </p>

<p>So what about the ability to integrate less common interfaces or proprietary sources? “We expect the open source community to build proprietary connectors,” says Marino. </p>

<p>There’s a full programmatic interface, this time using Python, for writing new components and customizing data integration ‘Pipelines’. And there are out-of-the-box connectors to sources like QuickBooks, salesforce.com, Oracle and Apache. Admittedly, the out-of-the-box connectors are thin on the ground today, but the company hopes the open source community will help.</p>

<p>Of course companies could attempt to write their own connectivity to many of these sources, but as Marino says, SnapLogic takes care of all the necessary transformations, which do change as applications and data standards evolve. </p>

<p>Marino said the firm does not know (or won’t say) how many people are actively using the earlier versions of the software, but he conceded that the company has “zero paying customers” as it has only just announced the Professional edition that has a subscription element. He said there have been “thousands” of downloads of the free version.</p>

<p>A collection of free SnapLogic Components and ‘Pipelines’, and further info, is available at <a href="http://www.snaplogic.org">www.snaplogic.org</a>. </p>

<p><br />
</p>]]>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>OOOOOF! A sucker punch to Microsoft’s Windows biz?</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.businessreviewonline.com/os/archives/2008/04/index.html#000653" />
<modified>2008-04-10T13:03:23Z</modified>
<issued>2008-04-10T12:59:13Z</issued>
<id>tag:www.businessreviewonline.com,2008:/os//4.653</id>
<created>2008-04-10T12:59:13Z</created>
<summary type="text/plain">At the Linux Foundation Collaboration Summit at the University of Texas Supercomputing Center a couple of days ago, HP announced the release of its first Linux-powered computer to be sold in the United States, the HP 2133 Mini-Note PC running Novell SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 10 Service Pack 1......</summary>
<author>
<name>Jason Stamper</name>

<email>jstamper@datamonitor.com</email>
</author>

<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.businessreviewonline.com/os/">
<![CDATA[<p>At the Linux Foundation Collaboration Summit at the University of Texas Supercomputing Center a couple of days ago, HP announced the release of its first Linux-powered computer to be sold in the United States, the HP 2133 Mini-Note PC running Novell SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 10 Service Pack 1...<br />
</p>]]>
<![CDATA[<p><br />
...OK, so this notebook won’t do much to harm Windows per se – and indeed I understand that buyers will be able to opt to have Windows Vista on it anyway – but I suspect that this kind of news will help to raise Linux’s profile amongst consumers.</p>

<p>You’re buying a new notebook, and a drop-down menu shows you that you can pay X if it has Windows, or a fair bit less if it comes with this thing called Linux. 'What’s that?', you ask yourself. 'And is it as good as Windows for my needs?' </p>

<p>Many buyers will still go with Windows if given the choice. But a whole load of buyers are going to be finding out about this new fangled, cheap operating system. Longer term, that’s not what you might call good news for Microsoft.<br />
</p>]]>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>MySQL CEO: it&apos;s tough for private open source firms</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.businessreviewonline.com/os/archives/2008/03/index.html#000649" />
<modified>2008-03-06T10:28:29Z</modified>
<issued>2008-03-06T10:18:57Z</issued>
<id>tag:www.businessreviewonline.com,2008:/os//4.649</id>
<created>2008-03-06T10:18:57Z</created>
<summary type="text/plain">Yesterday I caught up with Marten Mickos, the former CEO of open source database firm MySQL, which was recently acquired by Sun for $1bn. We had a wide-ranging chat about life, the universe and everything open source. One of the interesting points he made was that it’s often tough for smaller, private open source firms like MySQL to be taken seriously by enterprise customers or larger organizations. So much so, that being bought by Sun has already started to boost the firm’s revenues....</summary>
<author>
<name>Jason Stamper</name>

<email>jstamper@datamonitor.com</email>
</author>

<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.businessreviewonline.com/os/">
<![CDATA[<p>Yesterday I caught up with Marten Mickos, the former CEO of open source database firm MySQL, which was recently acquired by Sun for $1bn. We had a wide-ranging chat about life, the universe and everything open source.</p>

<p>One of the interesting points he made was that it’s often tough for smaller, private open source firms like MySQL to be taken seriously by enterprise customers or larger organizations. So much so, that being bought by Sun has already started to boost the firm’s revenues.</p>]]>
<![CDATA[<p>"As soon as the deal closed we immediately secured a big deal with a major European national police agency," said Mickos, now SVP database products at Sun. "Key to them choosing MySQL was that we are now part of a much larger public corporation. The deal wouldn't have happened when we were private."</p>

<p><img alt="marten-mickos.jpg" src="http://www.businessreviewonline.com/os/archives/marten-mickos.jpg" width="260" height="364" /> <br />
Marten Mickos, Sun SVP database products and former MySQL CEO.<br />
Image source: MySQL/Sun.</p>

<p>Downloads of the firm's free, open source database have accelerated too, from around 50,000 a day before the deal was announced to around 60,000 per day now - 67,000 copies were downloaded on Monday.</p>

<p>But perhaps the bigger question is how many of those downloads get beyond people just ‘kicking the tires’, and turn into active installations.</p>

<p>"My own estimate is that of those 60,000, around 6,000 are new, active installations," said Mickos. "Even that is a staggering volume."</p>

<p>Seeding the market with a free, open source database is clearly no longer a challenge for the originally Swedish firm. But how many of the 6,000 eventually buy into MySQL Enterprise, with the monitoring tools, support, and subscription that actually lines Sun's pockets?</p>

<p>"I would say the ratio is between one in one hundred and one in one thousand," said Mickos. "If you look at averages you get useless information, because we might get 10 million downloads in China and we know almost none of them will pay anything in the near future. In the web 2.0 space, most will pay. In countries with a high GDP, many will pay, and in those with a low economy absolutely nobody will pay today."</p>

<p>But even for those who use the software but do not pay anything, Mickos argues that the firm still benefits. "We get something before the user starts paying," said Mickos. "We get bug fixes, articles, community input. We have more engineering resource than IBM puts into DB2, even though they have 20 times more resources in-house."</p>

<p>Sun, of course, is hoping that as many customers as possible get their wallets out and pay for the Enterprise edition and its support package. Compared to MySQL's 200 field sales people, Sun has 17,000 at its disposal to sell the open source database.</p>

<p>But as Sun CEO Jonathan Schwartz explained on his blog, there is also the belief that many MySQL punters will also be looking for hardware and services, and he hopes they can be encouraged to choose Sun when that time comes.</p>

<p>But do people downloading MySQL really also procure their hardware in tandem? "When customers come to us for the first time there is no denying they come to us because we're free," said Mickos. "And at that stage they will run it on the cheapest, crappiest hardware they can find because they have no money. There's no business for any hardware firm there; not even Dell would make any money there. But although they start frugal, for many of them they then scale to the next level and that's when they start buying stuff."</p>

<p>Mickos said Sun should be able to sell hardware and services to non-paying customers as they start to scale up their use of the database.</p>

<p>"It's a marathon, not a sprint," he said. "If a 15-year-old downloads MySQL now, when do we get our money? In about 15 years' time when he is head of IT at a company and he loves MySQL. But in many cases it will happen sooner than that."</p>

<p>"In open source we say fail fast, scale fast. Many web 2.0 ideas will fail, but when Google or Facebook [two of MySQL's biggest customers] get it right they suddenly need to scale like crazy," Mickos said. "Open source is the only model where they can scale fast on exactly the same code base; it's the same product. All of the [commercial] database players have free versions, but when you need to scale you need a slightly different version [of the database]."</p>

<p>If waiting up to 15 years to see tangible revenue from these huge numbers of free downloads -- the firm has seen over 10 million downloads of its software so far -- sounds like a message that would have been hard to sell to shareholders had MySQL continued with its planned IPO, instead of being acquired, Mickos is unbowed.</p>

<p>"I would have no problem explaining it to shareholders," he said. "Number one is employees, number two customers, and number three shareholders."</p>

<p>While some observers baulked at the price tag for MySQL of $1bn when its current revenue is a mystery, I believe this was a particularly shrewd move by Sun CEO Schwartz and his team.</p>

<p>In the open source LAMP stack (Linux, Apache, MySQL, PHP/Perl/Python), MySQL is the only element owned by a specific company and for which there are no other realistic open source competitors.</p>

<p>With Sun now pinning its flag to the open source movement (note the open sourcing of Java and Solaris), it is probably the biggest contributor to open source of any commercial vendor, and it has the most to gain from widespread open source adoption as a result.</p>

<p>So while Sun's shareholders may question the logic of spending $1bn on an open source technology, being involved in so many IT projects right from their inception could open doors to Sun that it would not formerly have known existed.</p>

<p>In many cases, as Mickos candidly conceded, it may be up to 15 years before many of the MySQL faithful turn into paying subscribers, or buy into Sun hardware, services or other software. But even if it's a marathon rather than a sprint, the history books are likely to recall that Sun's MySQL purchase was key to its continued relevance in enterprise IT.</p>

<p>I’ll be doing some more blogs about my interview with Mickos in coming days so check back from time to time or add my open source blog to your RSS reader if that’s something likely to float your boat, so to speak.</p>]]>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Europeans ‘better’ contributors to open source community?</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.businessreviewonline.com/os/archives/2008/02/index.html#000648" />
<modified>2008-02-21T12:57:27Z</modified>
<issued>2008-02-21T12:32:03Z</issued>
<id>tag:www.businessreviewonline.com,2008:/os//4.648</id>
<created>2008-02-21T12:32:03Z</created>
<summary type="text/plain">I had an interesting chat yesterday with Javier Soltero, the CEO of open source web infrastructure management firm, Hyperic. We got to talking about the different attitudes to open source in the US and in Europe; you’ll recall a recent blog entry I did found slightly higher Linux desktop penetration in some European countries than in the US. Hyperic was founded in San Francisco but recently announced it’s targeting Europe more aggressively, hiring new community managers in Germany and Spain and on the look-out for more people in other European geographies. The privately-held, VC-backed firm claims to be seeing strong...</summary>
<author>
<name>Jason Stamper</name>

<email>jstamper@datamonitor.com</email>
</author>

<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.businessreviewonline.com/os/">
<![CDATA[<p>I had an interesting chat yesterday with Javier Soltero, the CEO of open source web infrastructure management firm, Hyperic. We got to talking about the different attitudes to open source in the US and in Europe; you’ll recall a <a href="http://www.businessreviewonline.com/os/archives/2008/02/germany_italy_l.html">recent blog entry </a>I did found slightly higher Linux desktop penetration in some European countries than in the US.</p>

<p>Hyperic was founded in San Francisco but recently announced it’s targeting Europe more aggressively, hiring new community managers in Germany and Spain and on the look-out for more people in other European geographies. </p>

<p>The privately-held, VC-backed firm claims to be seeing strong growth across all regions, adding 100 paying customers in the second half of 2007 to take the total to 400, though it says the free version of the web management software, which lacks a support package and other enterprise features, has seen several thousand downloads since the firm was launched in 2004.</p>

<p>So how does an open source CEO see attitudes to open source differing across Europe from the US?</p>]]>
<![CDATA[<p><br />
...According to Soltero, it’s harder having your voice heard as an open source player in the US: “In the US I’d actually say this sector is a little ‘noisy’ – there are a lot of people in open source saying exactly the same thing and breaking away from that in a crowded technology market is difficult.”</p>

<p>But as for end users’ appetite for open source, he said: ““In Europe the open source trend is definitely gaining increased momentum. And the surprising thing is that in European geographies we find a bigger appetite amongst enterprises for participation in the open source community and specific open source projects.”</p>

<p>Soltero said that 37% of all the Hyperic community activity comes directly from Europe – a high percentage considering the size of the US market and the fact Hyperic is based in the US.</p>

<p>“There seems to be a clearer sense amongst folks in Europe using open source that you don’t get something for nothing,” Soltero continued, “that even if all they give back is feedback that can help other users, it’s important to contribute something. Sometimes in the US people will see open source as just a free product. That’s fine too, we have a free product for them, but it’s great when companies participate for the greater good.”</p>

<p>Hyperic meanwhile says it is complementary to the big four systems management companies (IBM Tivoli, CA, Compuware, and BMC) because they don't focus enough on web infrastructure management.</p>

<p>It recently launched Hyperic HQ 3.2, two new OEM partnerships with SpringSource and Iona, and a jointly developed management project with Red Hat, called RHQ.</p>

<p>The RHQ project is the result of an extension of the partnership between Red Hat and Hyperic first announced in November last year. The RHQ project aims to develop a common services management platform that will be used in future versions of each company's products. As the next major milestone in this effort, the RHQ project will serve as the code base for JBoss Operations Network v2.0 due out this spring.</p>

<p>Hyperic's open source web infrastructure management technology is aimed squarely at those in the enterprise responsible for the company's web infrastructure. It collates and analyzes information from all of the technologies that underpin web applications, including the likes of databases, application servers, web servers, and even virtualization technology where it has been deployed.</p>

<p>Information collated by Hyperic's software can also be exported to other business intelligence or systems management tools for further dissemination or analysis, but Soltero said that for now the company has no plans to expand the technology beyond managing the web infrastructure.</p>

<p>Hyperic has raised $10m in two VC rounds to date, one in 2006 and one in 2007. It has grown from five employees in 2005 to around 40 today. As well as offering a free download for those not needing all of the enterprise bells and whistles, there is a free evaluation version of the enterprise edition available from the company's <a href="http://www.hyperic.com">web site</a>.<br />
</p>]]>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Red Hat wants JBoss to own 50% of middleware market by 2015</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.businessreviewonline.com/os/archives/2008/02/index.html#000647" />
<modified>2008-02-13T18:34:05Z</modified>
<issued>2008-02-13T18:31:21Z</issued>
<id>tag:www.businessreviewonline.com,2008:/os//4.647</id>
<created>2008-02-13T18:31:21Z</created>
<summary type="text/plain">Red Hat has just launched an “Enterprise Acceleration” initiative that it says it hopes will enable its JBoss business to capture 50% of enterprise middleware workloads by 2015. IBM, Oracle, SAP, Sun and plenty of others are surely hoping it fails......</summary>
<author>
<name>Jason Stamper</name>

<email>jstamper@datamonitor.com</email>
</author>

<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.businessreviewonline.com/os/">
<![CDATA[<p>Red Hat has just launched an “Enterprise Acceleration” initiative that it says it hopes will enable its JBoss business to capture 50% of enterprise middleware workloads by 2015. IBM, Oracle, SAP, Sun and plenty of others are surely hoping it fails...</p>]]>
<![CDATA[<p></p>

<p>...Red Hat said the strategy involves expanding the JBoss Enterprise Middleware portfolio, growing the partner ecosystem, sponsoring new projects in the open source community and introducing new resources to “ensure enterprise-class performance and interoperability”.  </p>

<p>Craig Muzilla, vice president, Middleware Business at Red Hat explained, "We are now focused on expanding further into the enterprise with a comprehensive, open source middleware portfolio and programs to ensure confidence and success of mission-critical applications."</p>

<p>The firm said many enterprises are dissatisfied with what it called “inflexible, monolithic and low-value proprietary middleware offerings”. I think we know who they are talking about. Apparently lots of customers want to “expand the value they've experienced with open source infrastructure and application servers such as Red Hat Enterprise Linux and JBoss Enterprise Application Platform.”</p>

<p>“Subsequently, many enterprises are now establishing comprehensive open source middleware reference architectures to deliver the applications and services that their businesses demand, at a rapid pace and within a cost structure that allows them to scale their business, not just their infrastructure,” Red Hat said.</p>

<p>The firm backed up the plans with a glowing testimony from an existing client – with added gravitas thanks to the fact it’s the Swedish Police. </p>

<p>“Our initial project with JBoss Enterprise Middleware has been such a resounding success,” said Per-Ola Sjöswärd, executive IT strategist at the Swedish National Police Board, “in terms of meeting our performance requirements and the level of professional support we received from JBoss that the Swedish Police Board is planning on migrating a further four large IT systems to the open source architecture in 2008, of which JBoss Enterprise Middleware is a key part, with another 15 new projects in the pipeline." </p>

<p>“Wahoo!” said the JBoss sales representative selling to the Swedish police. They might have done, anyway. “Boo!” said IBM’s head of software Steve Mills, or at least he may well have done. </p>

<p>Anyway the Enterprise Acceleration initiative consists of the JBoss Enterprise Middleware stack, which the firm said it is expanding to include the JBoss Enterprise SOA Platform. It’s also saying it will introduce new community projects that are expected to become future JBoss Enterprise Middleware platforms or platform components. </p>

<p>It talked a bit about its platform, frameworks, maintenance, testing and certification, but none of that looks particularly new. What will be new though is a resource center for Enterprise Acceleration to, “help accelerate the transition to next-generation, open source middleware architectures required to deliver applications and services, at a rapid pace and within a cost structure that enables IT to scale their business, not just their infrastructure.”</p>

<p>It will include a performance tuning lab, live certification center for ISVs and customers to test their applications, and a migration lab for processes, partners, services and best practices to move from rival software to JBoss. Red Hat said the new Enterprise Acceleration Center also will also benefit its partner ecosystem by helping them speed their JBoss middleware customer implementations.</p>

<p>The long and short: Red Hat wants half the enterprise middleware market by 2015 and it sees its partner ecosystem as just as crucial as its technology for it to achieve that.<br />
</p>]]>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Sun lays its open source virtualization cards on the table</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.businessreviewonline.com/os/archives/2008/02/index.html#000645" />
<modified>2008-02-12T16:36:11Z</modified>
<issued>2008-02-12T16:32:56Z</issued>
<id>tag:www.businessreviewonline.com,2008:/os//4.645</id>
<created>2008-02-12T16:32:56Z</created>
<summary type="text/plain">News just in is that Sun is buying innotek, the open source virtualization player whose VirtualBox enables desktop or laptop PCs running the Windows, Linux, Mac or Solaris operating systems to run multiple, different operating systems side-by-side......</summary>
<author>
<name>Jason Stamper</name>

<email>jstamper@datamonitor.com</email>
</author>

<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.businessreviewonline.com/os/">
<![CDATA[<p>News just in is that Sun is buying innotek, the open source virtualization player whose VirtualBox enables desktop or laptop PCs running the Windows, Linux, Mac or Solaris operating systems to run multiple, different operating systems side-by-side...</p>]]>
<![CDATA[<p>... Adding to Sun’s acquisition on January 16 of MySQL, the open source database player, Sun said this latest move confirms it is the “largest commercial open source contributor.” </p>

<p>Sun is buying innotek with stock, and the terms of the deal are undisclosed.</p>

<p>"VirtualBox provides Sun with the perfect complement to our recently announced Sun xVM Server product," said Rich Green, executive vice president, Sun Software. “Where Sun xVM Server is designed to enable dynamic IT at the heart of the datacenter, VirtualBox is ideal for any laptop or desktop environment and will align perfectly with Sun’s other developer focused assets such as GlassFish, OpenSolaris, OpenJDK and soon MySQL as well as a wide range of community open source projects, enabling developers to quickly develop, test and deploy the next generation of applications."</p>

<p>Sun said there have been over four million downloads of the free, open source VirtualBox software since January 2007. It said as part of Sun’s xVM portfolio, VirtualBox will have the support of Sun’s global development community, field resources and partners to make VirtualBox even more compelling.</p>

<p>VirtualBox basically enables desktop or laptop PCs running the Windows, Linux, Mac or Solaris operating systems to run multiple, different operating systems side-by-side, switching between them with a mouse-click. This enables software developers to more easily build multi-tier or cross-platform applications, or power-users to take advantage of applications that may not be available for their base operating system of choice, Sun said.</p>

<p>VirtualBox can be downloaded at virtualbox.org or openxvm.org. The software will run on Windows, Linux, Mac and Solaris operating systems, while supported guest operating systems include all versions of Windows from 3.1 to Vista, Linux 2.2, 2.4 and 2.6 kernels, Solaris x86, OS/2, Netware and DOS.</p>

<p> The acquisition is subject to customary closing conditions and is expected to be completed during the third quarter of Sun's 2008 fiscal year. </p>

<p>Innotek is based in Stuttgart, Germany with offices in Dresden, Berlin and the Russian Federation. </p>]]>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Germany, Australia and Italy lead desktop Linux adoption</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.businessreviewonline.com/os/archives/2008/02/index.html#000643" />
<modified>2008-02-07T12:13:43Z</modified>
<issued>2008-02-06T10:09:43Z</issued>
<id>tag:www.businessreviewonline.com,2008:/os//4.643</id>
<created>2008-02-06T10:09:43Z</created>
<summary type="text/plain">I’ve penned a few blogs about Linux on the desktop, and the fact that various statistics I’ve uncovered suggest it has less than a 1% market share. There’s nothing wrong with that – Linux, indeed all open source software, has been doing pretty awesomely in other areas. Anyway I just came across some more stats from OneStat.com, which analyses the operating systems in use based on a sample of 2 million visitors to a wide range of websites. Its technology can basically tell which OS you’re running when you visit certain websites. Anyway as previously blogged, the stats showed that...</summary>
<author>
<name>Jason Stamper</name>

<email>jstamper@datamonitor.com</email>
</author>

<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.businessreviewonline.com/os/">
<![CDATA[<p>I’ve penned a few blogs about <a href="http://www.businessreviewonline.com/os/archives/2008/01/will_2008_be_th.html">Linux on the desktop</a>, and the fact that various statistics I’ve uncovered suggest it has less than a 1% market share.</p>

<p>There’s nothing wrong with that – Linux, indeed all open source software, has been doing pretty awesomely in other areas.</p>

<p>Anyway I just came across some more stats from OneStat.com, which analyses the operating systems in use based on a sample of 2 million visitors to a wide range of websites. Its technology can basically tell which OS you’re running when you visit certain websites.</p>

<p>Anyway as previously blogged, the stats showed that Linux has a 0.36% market share worldwide, with Macs coming in at 2.7% and Windows at 96.72%. Windows Vista came in at 3.23%. Even Windows ME, at 0.64%, is bigger than Linux. Big deal. Or perhaps since it’s ME we’re talking about, little deal.</p>

<p>Anyway I thought the data split out by country was quite interesting too. I would have thought Linux on the desktop would have been biggest in the US: it was obviously just an impression, but you always think of the US as having a particularly vocal and passionate Linux community. </p>

<p>That may still be the case, but they’re not necessarily voting with their feet when it comes to using Linux on the desktop...</p>

<p><br />
</p>]]>
<![CDATA[<p>... In the US, 0.39% were running Linux as their desktop OS. The highest usage was actually in Germany, with 0.83% -- more than twice that of the US. Australia was next with 0.73%. Linux is clearly relatively popular down under.</p>

<p>Speaking of passion, I was surprised which country came in with the third-highest Linux desktop usage: Italy, with 0.63%. Belgium followed at 0.61%, then the UK with 0.46%, Canada at 0.44% and France with 0.43%. Finally of those tracked, the Netherlands came in at 0.32%.</p>

<p>That means that usage of Linux as a desktop OS actually ranges from 0.83% in Germany, to 0.32% in the Netherlands. I welcome any anecdotal evidence from readers in those countries (or those in-between) that might support or refute these stats…</p>

<p>The original research is <a href="http://www.onestat.com/html/aboutus_pressbox54-windows-vista-global-usage-share.html">here</a>. I asked them to send me some updated stats but my email disappeared into a black hole; I note the latest press release on their site is from October last year.<br />
</p>]]>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Open source up 26% in the enterprise</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.businessreviewonline.com/os/archives/2008/01/index.html#000641" />
<modified>2008-01-31T15:43:18Z</modified>
<issued>2008-01-31T15:40:07Z</issued>
<id>tag:www.businessreviewonline.com,2008:/os//4.641</id>
<created>2008-01-31T15:40:07Z</created>
<summary type="text/plain">More good news for the open source community just in: an analysis of its enterprise customers by OpenLogic found that for 2007 as a whole, the use of open source among enterprise customers is up 26% year-on-year. Enterprises on average used a whopping 94 different open source packages last year, compared to 75 in 2006…...</summary>
<author>
<name>Jason Stamper</name>

<email>jstamper@datamonitor.com</email>
</author>

<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.businessreviewonline.com/os/">
<![CDATA[<p>More good news for the open source community just in: an analysis of its enterprise customers by OpenLogic found that for 2007 as a whole, the use of open source among enterprise customers is up 26% year-on-year. Enterprises on average used a whopping 94 different open source packages last year, compared to 75 in 2006…</p>]]>
<![CDATA[<p></p>

<p>OpenLogic -- which provides enterprises with a certified library of open source software that encompasses hundreds of open source packages via OpenLogic Exchange (OLEX) – also found that Apache is still the most common license in packages used in enterprises today. </p>

<p>Its breakdown of licenses for the top 25 packages found that Apache, not the GPL, is the most common license. 62% of the packages use Apache, 27% use some variant of GPL and 4% each use BSD, CPL, Eclipse, MPL and Perl licenses (since packages may be released under two or more licenses, percentages total to more than 100%).</p>

<p>OpenLogic also said it plans this year to launch The Open Source Census, which it says will expand the statistics collected and reported on enterprise open source adoption. </p>

<p>The Open Source Census, announced by OpenLogic in December 2007, is described as a collaborative initiative designed to provide enterprises with a way to easily inventory the open source software installed on their machines, and anonymously submit that data to The Open Source Census. </p>

<p>Data collected in The Open Source Census will be aggregated and shared publicly on the Internet and will also be available to the enterprises who contribute data.</p>

<p>For more visit www.openlogic.com.</p>]]>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Linux is hotter than Britney Spears and Paris Hilton: official</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.businessreviewonline.com/os/archives/2008/01/index.html#000639" />
<modified>2008-01-10T11:44:56Z</modified>
<issued>2008-01-10T10:48:43Z</issued>
<id>tag:www.businessreviewonline.com,2008:/os//4.639</id>
<created>2008-01-10T10:48:43Z</created>
<summary type="text/plain">Hit me baby one more time! Yes that’s right; Linux is officially scorching hot – hotter than both Britney Spears and Paris Hilton. Never mind One Night in Paris, how about One Night of Open Source? What on earth am I banging on about? I’m glad you asked. I used Google’s Zeitgeist search trends analysis tool to compare the frequency and volume of searches for ‘Linux’ with those of ‘Britney’ and ‘Paris Hilton’, between June 2004 and June 2007 (the latest date for which data is available). As the graphs below show, more people searched for Linux more often than...</summary>
<author>
<name>Jason Stamper</name>

<email>jstamper@datamonitor.com</email>
</author>

<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.businessreviewonline.com/os/">
<![CDATA[<p>Hit me baby one more time! Yes that’s right; Linux is officially <em>scorching </em>hot – hotter than both Britney Spears and Paris Hilton. Never mind One Night in Paris, how about <em>One Night of Open Source</em>? </p>

<p>What on earth am I banging on about? I’m glad you asked. I used Google’s Zeitgeist search trends analysis tool to compare the frequency and volume of searches for ‘Linux’ with those of ‘Britney’ and ‘Paris Hilton’, between June 2004 and June 2007 (the latest date for which data is available). </p>

<p>As the graphs below show, more people searched for Linux more often than those searching for Britney or Paris. With one or two underwear-dodging exceptions…</p>]]>
<![CDATA[<p>Britney outgunned Linux a few times in 2006 and 2007, which is perhaps unsurprising: it’s not as if Linux can boost its own popularity by stepping out of a sports car wearing no underwear. For one thing, penguins <em>never </em>wear underwear.</p>

<p>But not even Paris’ choice to go commando when she knew the paparazzi were about was enough to raise her profile above Linux: as the next graph shows, people didn’t search for her on Google as much as they did Linux between 2004 and 2007.</p>

<p>Is there a serious point behind any of this? Maybe there is. As the graphs also show, the number of people searching for Linux has actually been in decline between 2004 and 2007. What does that mean? It could be that fewer people are interested in Linux now than back in 2004. </p>

<p>But probably more likely, it could mean that fewer people need to search Google for information about Linux now than back then: people either already know what they need to know about it, or they know exactly where to go to find the information they need, without swinging by Google to help them navigate their way to it. </p>

<p>As the graphs also show, the volume of news articles about Linux has been on the rise over the same period (shown in the lower half of the graphs), corroborating this theory perhaps.</p>

<p>Which do you think is more likely? Drop me a comment and let me know. And feel free to add your view on which is hotter: Britney, Paris, or that <em>smokin’ </em>Linux penguin?</p>

<p><br />
<strong>Linux vs. Britney Spears</strong> (Linux is in blue)<br />
<img alt="linux britney.jpg" src="http://www.businessreviewonline.com/os/archives/linux%20britney.jpg" width="322" height="144" /></p>

<p>Source: Google Zeitgeist.  A: Linux users descend on San Francisco expo; B: <a href="http://www.cbronline.com/article_news.asp?guid=5F760468-7288-48C3-AB6B-592B99A41CBA">Red Hat Releases Enterprise Linux 4</a>; C: Lineox Releases Lineox Enterprise Linux 4.0 RC1; D: <a href="http://www.cbronline.com/article_cbr.asp?guid=8F9E4BC2-A79C-405A-AEA9-69D31357223C">Microsoft Linux!</a>; E: <a href="http://www.cbronline.com/article_news.asp?guid=27EDD745-7986-482A-AECC-4DC53CA776B3">Dell joins Microsoft/Novell Linux pact</a>; F: <a href="http://www.cbronline.com/article_feature_print.asp?guid=D895FC26-C9F7-4A5B-815B-55951775179D">Oracle Enterprise Linux</a>.</p>

<p></p>

<p></p>

<p><br />
<strong>Linux vs. Paris Hilton</strong> (Linux is in blue)<br />
<img alt="linux paris.jpg" src="http://www.businessreviewonline.com/os/archives/linux%20paris.jpg" width="322" height="144" /></p>

<p>Source: Google Zeitgeist. A: Linux users descend on San Francisco expo; B: Lineox Releases Lineox Enterprise Linux 4.0 RC1; C: <a href="http://www.cbronline.com/article_cbr.asp?guid=8F9E4BC2-A79C-405A-AEA9-69D31357223C">Microsoft Linux!</a>; D: <a href="http://www.cbronline.com/article_news.asp?guid=27EDD745-7986-482A-AECC-4DC53CA776B3">Dell joins Microsoft/Novell Linux pact</a>; E: Paris Hilton Leaves Jail; F: <a href="http://www.cbronline.com/article_feature_print.asp?guid=D895FC26-C9F7-4A5B-815B-55951775179D">Oracle Enterprise Linux</a>.</p>

<p></p>

<p><a href="javascript:location.href='http://digg.com/submit?phase=2&url='+encodeURIComponent(document.location.href)+' '">Digg this</a></p>

<p><script type="text/javascript" src="http://embed.technorati.com/embed/ahypk3hfhq.js"></script><br />
</p>]]>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Will 2008 be the year of Linux on the desktop?</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.businessreviewonline.com/os/archives/2008/01/index.html#000637" />
<modified>2008-01-07T15:32:38Z</modified>
<issued>2008-01-07T15:27:25Z</issued>
<id>tag:www.businessreviewonline.com,2008:/os//4.637</id>
<created>2008-01-07T15:27:25Z</created>
<summary type="text/plain">It looks unlikely. The meteoric rise of Linux as a server operating system - analysts say as it has around 30% market share in that space - is not being matched by its use as a desktop operating system, and there&apos;s no reason to believe that will change much this year. Whatever the Linux faithful might like to believe, the evidence suggests that as a percentage of total desktop operating systems worldwide, Linux has barely left the starting blocks......</summary>
<author>
<name>Jason Stamper</name>

<email>jstamper@datamonitor.com</email>
</author>

<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.businessreviewonline.com/os/">
<![CDATA[<p>It looks unlikely. The meteoric rise of Linux as a server operating system - analysts say as it has around 30% market share in that space - is not being matched by its use as a desktop operating system, and there's no reason to believe that will change much this year.</p>

<p>Whatever the Linux faithful might like to believe, the evidence suggests that as a percentage of total desktop operating systems worldwide, Linux has barely left the starting blocks...</p>]]>
<![CDATA[<p>Market share figures are not easy to come by, which is part of the reason for the Linux community to believe that Linux is being far more successful on the desktop than it really is. </p>

<p>But a firm called OneStat.com did some recent research into the desktop operating systems being used by 2 million visitors to various websites around the world. OneStat.com's system can discover what desktop OS website visitors are running. According to its research, just 0.36% were running Linux. 96.7% were running Windows, and 2.7% Macs.</p>

<p>So for all the hype, it seems there still aren't many users running Linux on their desktop machines - at least, not the kind of users that visited websites being monitored by OneStat.com. Which is actually quite a large caveat, because it seems one of the areas where Linux has started to make in-roads on the desktop is for uses such as call centers, where high volume, low-cost desktops are the order of the day. In some cases, those machines would never be used to visit websites.</p>

<p>The $6bn services and consultancy firm Siemens IT Solutions & Services was installing so many Linux desktops for its customers back in 2003, that it predicted Linux would leapfrog MacOS (which is a Linux-based OS anyway) as the second biggest desktop operating system after Windows by 2008. Of course, it may yet achieve that, but the OneStat.com figures suggest it still has a way to go even if we allow for a margin of error of a few percentage points.</p>

<p>The OneStat.com figures are probably not too far out though: they also found that the latest Windows OS, Vista, was in use on around 3% of desktops worldwide (with 94% using older versions of Windows). A recent survey by Computer Business Review found that out of 200 senior IT decision-makers in the UK, 2% of their firms had already upgraded to Vista. That suggests the OneStat.com figures are pretty representative.</p>

<p>Linux may yet make significant inroads as a desktop operating system. Many believe it can deliver productivity equal to Windows at a fraction of the cost, and the Linux community would claim it is a more secure, robust operating system than Windows. </p>

<p>The Linux community points to large Linux roll-outs in the public sector as proof of its growing popularity on the desktop, but perhaps an even greater market lies in developing countries, where Windows may prove too expensive for a vast proportion of the world's population. </p>

<p>On the other hand, many doing business with the more developed nations may opt for Windows for compatibility reasons. Ultimately though, there is surely room in the market for three viable desktop operating systems, and Linux is one of them. As its message spreads - by word of mouth as much as the marketing of any vendors - we expect it to overtake MacOS as the second most-popular desktop operating system inside of three years. The question is, exactly how much share will it steal from Microsoft's Windows? </p>

<p>Current growth rates suggest Gates and Ballmer do not need to lose too much sleep just yet. Indeed, a bigger concern for them right now is getting existing Windows users to buy into Vista.</p>

<p><br />
<a href="javascript:location.href='http://digg.com/submit?phase=2&url='+encodeURIComponent(document.location.href)+' '">Digg this</a></p>

<p><script type="text/javascript" src="http://embed.technorati.com/embed/ahypk3hfhq.js"></script><br />
</p>]]>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Looking back on 2007, and towards 2008</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.businessreviewonline.com/os/archives/2007/12/index.html#000636" />
<modified>2007-12-24T11:42:18Z</modified>
<issued>2007-12-24T11:36:00Z</issued>
<id>tag:www.businessreviewonline.com,2007:/os//4.636</id>
<created>2007-12-24T11:36:00Z</created>
<summary type="text/plain">So 2007 will be remembered for BI consolidation: Cognos buying Applix, Oracle buying Hyperion, SAP buying Business Objects and IBM buying Cognos. That and the iPhone hype, of course. In open source SCO&apos;s case hit the rocks, Red Hat got a new CEO, and Linux continued to make little impression as a desktop OS! Still, at least it is still making excellent progress as an infrastructure enabler. But what will 2008 have in store for enterprise IT?...</summary>
<author>
<name>Jason Stamper</name>

<email>jstamper@datamonitor.com</email>
</author>

<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.businessreviewonline.com/os/">
<![CDATA[<p>So 2007 will be remembered for BI consolidation: Cognos buying Applix, Oracle buying Hyperion, SAP buying Business Objects and IBM buying Cognos. That and the iPhone hype, of course.</p>

<p>In open source SCO's case hit the rocks, Red Hat got a new CEO, and Linux continued to make little impression as a desktop OS! Still, at least it is still making excellent progress as an infrastructure enabler. But what will 2008 have in store for enterprise IT? </p>]]>
<![CDATA[<p>My three big predictions are that you'll hear a lot more about 'green IT', business process management (BPM), and performance management (PM). </p>

<p>Companies will still be doing SOA, but they'll in many cases be looking to BPM as a veneer on top of their SOA to give business people more power over their own systems and to free up the IT department a little.</p>

<p>Everyone will come out with a 'green' IT angle, even the least efficient, most polluting equipment providers.</p>

<p>And finally, the platform companies that bought all the BI players will start making a lot of noise about performance management, which some might call the next phase in BI. Taking the power of BI and making it a little easier to use, and a little more tailored to the real needs of the business professional. Watch out for some of the open source BI players to get a bit of a 'halo effect' from this too!</p>

<p>Whatever 2008 holds, we wish all our readers a very Happy Christmas and a Merry New Year!</p>

<p><br />
<a href="javascript:location.href='http://digg.com/submit?phase=2&url='+encodeURIComponent(document.location.href)+' '">Digg this</a></p>

<p><script type="text/javascript" src="http://embed.technorati.com/embed/ahypk3hfhq.js"></script></p>]]>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Check out our BI special report</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.businessreviewonline.com/os/archives/2007/12/index.html#000632" />
<modified>2007-12-14T13:08:54Z</modified>
<issued>2007-12-14T12:52:04Z</issued>
<id>tag:www.businessreviewonline.com,2007:/os//4.632</id>
<created>2007-12-14T12:52:04Z</created>
<summary type="text/plain">As I mentioned on a previous blog, we co-produced a special report on business intelligence with Special Report Publishing, which was distributed with The Daily Telegraph yesterday. In case you missed it, we’ve posted the stories into our Business Intelligence Analysis Center, which you can find on the left of our home page. But to make it even simpler for you to find all of the articles, I’ve created a mini contents page for you down below: now isn’t that what you call organised! How to put your data to work What’s in your basket? A look at BI in...</summary>
<author>
<name>Jason Stamper</name>

<email>jstamper@datamonitor.com</email>
</author>

<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.businessreviewonline.com/os/">
<![CDATA[<p>As I mentioned on a previous blog, we co-produced a special report on business intelligence with Special Report Publishing, which was distributed with The Daily Telegraph yesterday. </p>

<p>In case you missed it, we’ve posted the stories into our Business Intelligence Analysis Center, which you can find on the left of our home page.</p>

<p>But to make it even simpler for you to find all of the articles, I’ve created a mini contents page for you down below: now isn’t that what you call organised!</p>

<p><a href="http://www.cbronline.com/article_news.asp?guid=134CC9DF-60BC-4FD8-857F-628C219E2FEA">How to put your data to work</a></p>

<p><a href="http://www.cbronline.com/article_news.asp?guid=5965553D-6516-443F-8F28-C31C7658B224&z=rc_Datawarehousing">What’s in your basket? A look at BI in retail.</a></p>

<p><a href="http://www.cbronline.com/article_news.asp?guid=4C5956AC-AB57-4D59-871B-BD935086BD8E&z=rc_Datawarehousing">Brave new world: a look at enterprise search</a></p>

<p><a href="http://www.cbronline.com/article_news.asp?guid=67C2B569-BE88-467D-8EF5-AED9FE74E5D1&z=rc_Datawarehousing">Making the business case for BI investment</a></p>

<p><a href="http://www.cbronline.com/article_news.asp?guid=6C8C5412-AAD1-441A-9815-60AD525CDBA9">Q&A with business intelligence experts </a></p>

<p><a href="http://www.cbronline.com/article_news.asp?guid=8A14E965-3757-44E7-B2AE-D1D95E10FCCC">Technology focus: the different approaches to BI</a></p>

<p><a href="http://www.cbronline.com/article_news.asp?guid=A281B0C8-5F5E-4760-8347-C7B9A2FC966D">Café Nero case study: why they implemented Cognos, and what they achieved by doing so.</a></p>

<p><a href="http://www.cbronline.com/article_news.asp?guid=C4B0EA1C-4478-4A56-A2B4-C7CABD86EE8B">Power to perform: from BI to performance management</a></p>

<p><a href="http://www.cbronline.com/article_news.asp?guid=D5697978-5ADD-4318-B5C1-8D85686A487E">Safe & secure: lessons learned from the HM Revenue and Customs data debacle</a></p>]]>

</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>If you read one thing tomorrow…</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.businessreviewonline.com/os/archives/2007/12/index.html#000630" />
<modified>2007-12-12T16:23:05Z</modified>
<issued>2007-12-12T11:09:57Z</issued>
<id>tag:www.businessreviewonline.com,2007:/os//4.630</id>
<created>2007-12-12T11:09:57Z</created>
<summary type="text/plain">CBR has co-produced a special report in the Daily Telegraph that will be appearing tomorrow (Thursday, 13 December). So if you’re in the UK, pick up a copy at all good newsagents. The report is on business intelligence, and you probably don’t need me to tell you what a hot topic that is right now. Little wonder that over $15bn worth of acquisitions have been consummated in just four deals this year: Oracle buying Hyperion, SAP buying Business Objects, Cognos buying Applix and then IBM buying Cognos. The report looks at the latest trends in BI: the move towards performance...</summary>
<author>
<name>Jason Stamper</name>

<email>jstamper@datamonitor.com</email>
</author>

<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.businessreviewonline.com/os/">
<![CDATA[<p>CBR has co-produced a special report in the Daily Telegraph that will be appearing tomorrow (Thursday, 13 December). So if you’re in the UK, pick up a copy at all good newsagents. </p>

<p>The report is on business intelligence, and you probably don’t need me to tell you what a hot topic that is right now. Little wonder that over $15bn worth of acquisitions have been consummated in just four deals this year: Oracle buying Hyperion, SAP buying Business Objects, Cognos buying Applix and then IBM buying Cognos.</p>

<p>The report looks at the latest trends in BI: the move towards performance management; the rise of enterprise search from the likes of Autonomy, FAST and Google Enterprise; the sophisticated use of BI in the retail sector and even how to justify investment in business intelligence technologies.</p>

<p>There’s a roundup of the latest news, and some thought-provoking factoids – for example that the term business intelligence was first used in the context in which we now use it, in an article in 1958 written by H.P.Luhn in the IBM Journal.</p>

<p>CBR co-produced it with those nice people at <a href="http://www.specialreportpublishing.com/">Special Report Publishing</a>. It features comment from many of the experts in the BI field, coverage of one or two open source BI vendors like JasperSoft, and even takes a look at how companies can avoid a major data loss such as that experienced by Nationwide with the loss of a laptop early this year, or HMRC and its two missing computer discs. </p>

<p>Anyway, check it out tomorrow, and be sure to let me know what you think.</p>

<p><br />
<a href="javascript:location.href='http://digg.com/submit?phase=2&url='+encodeURIComponent(document.location.href)+' '">Digg this</a></p>

<p><script type="text/javascript" src="http://embed.technorati.com/embed/ahypk3hfhq.js"></script></p>

<p> <br />
</p>]]>

</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Press Association Rolls Out Nuxeo ECM</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.businessreviewonline.com/os/archives/2007/11/index.html#000628" />
<modified>2007-11-27T17:43:55Z</modified>
<issued>2007-11-27T17:39:16Z</issued>
<id>tag:www.businessreviewonline.com,2007:/os//4.628</id>
<created>2007-11-27T17:39:16Z</created>
<summary type="text/plain">The Press Association, the UK’s national news association, is rolling out Nuxeo’s open source enterprise content management platform to improve the way it distributes digital content. And to think just a few weeks ago we weren&apos;t even familiar with Nuxeo. PA was looking to replace its old bespoke system with something that could handle multimedia content and reduce the number of keystrokes it took for journalists to post stories. Nuxeo provided a happy medium for the company between entirely building a system from scratch and buying an off-the-shelf package requiring a lot of customization....</summary>
<author>
<name>Jason Stamper</name>

<email>jstamper@datamonitor.com</email>
</author>

<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.businessreviewonline.com/os/">
<![CDATA[<p>The Press Association, the UK’s national news association, is rolling out Nuxeo’s open source enterprise content management platform to improve the way it distributes digital content. And to think just a few weeks ago we weren't even familiar with Nuxeo.</p>

<p>PA was looking to replace its old bespoke system with something that could handle multimedia content and reduce the number of keystrokes it took for journalists to post stories.</p>

<p>Nuxeo provided a happy medium for the company between entirely building a system from scratch and buying an off-the-shelf package requiring a lot of customization.</p>]]>
<![CDATA[<p>Working together, the two companies have completed the first iteration of the system and will introduce the full version in the first quarter of 2008, initially to 50 journalists and then to other sections of the editorial team.</p>

<p>Paul Berman, IT development director at PA, said that using open source will give the IT team far more flexibility and control to make changes without having to negotiate with suppliers or pay them license fees.</p>

<p>“We’re pleased with joint and agile development,” said Berman. “And we’re doing more and more open source. It’s not free, but what you do get is control over features and costs. From an editorial standpoint it’s a much more efficient, smarter system that does more for journalists and handles multimedia, while the older system was text based."</p>]]>
</content>
</entry>

</feed>