Add to Technorati Favorites

Add to My Yahoo!

RECENT ARTICLES

Open Source Blog

Will 2008 be the year of Linux on the desktop?
January 07, 2008

It looks unlikely. The meteoric rise of Linux as a server operating system - analysts say as it has around 30% market share in that space - is not being matched by its use as a desktop operating system, and there's no reason to believe that will change much this year.

Whatever the Linux faithful might like to believe, the evidence suggests that as a percentage of total desktop operating systems worldwide, Linux has barely left the starting blocks...

Market share figures are not easy to come by, which is part of the reason for the Linux community to believe that Linux is being far more successful on the desktop than it really is.

But a firm called OneStat.com did some recent research into the desktop operating systems being used by 2 million visitors to various websites around the world. OneStat.com's system can discover what desktop OS website visitors are running. According to its research, just 0.36% were running Linux. 96.7% were running Windows, and 2.7% Macs.

So for all the hype, it seems there still aren't many users running Linux on their desktop machines - at least, not the kind of users that visited websites being monitored by OneStat.com. Which is actually quite a large caveat, because it seems one of the areas where Linux has started to make in-roads on the desktop is for uses such as call centers, where high volume, low-cost desktops are the order of the day. In some cases, those machines would never be used to visit websites.

The $6bn services and consultancy firm Siemens IT Solutions & Services was installing so many Linux desktops for its customers back in 2003, that it predicted Linux would leapfrog MacOS (which is a Linux-based OS anyway) as the second biggest desktop operating system after Windows by 2008. Of course, it may yet achieve that, but the OneStat.com figures suggest it still has a way to go even if we allow for a margin of error of a few percentage points.

The OneStat.com figures are probably not too far out though: they also found that the latest Windows OS, Vista, was in use on around 3% of desktops worldwide (with 94% using older versions of Windows). A recent survey by Computer Business Review found that out of 200 senior IT decision-makers in the UK, 2% of their firms had already upgraded to Vista. That suggests the OneStat.com figures are pretty representative.

Linux may yet make significant inroads as a desktop operating system. Many believe it can deliver productivity equal to Windows at a fraction of the cost, and the Linux community would claim it is a more secure, robust operating system than Windows.

The Linux community points to large Linux roll-outs in the public sector as proof of its growing popularity on the desktop, but perhaps an even greater market lies in developing countries, where Windows may prove too expensive for a vast proportion of the world's population.

On the other hand, many doing business with the more developed nations may opt for Windows for compatibility reasons. Ultimately though, there is surely room in the market for three viable desktop operating systems, and Linux is one of them. As its message spreads - by word of mouth as much as the marketing of any vendors - we expect it to overtake MacOS as the second most-popular desktop operating system inside of three years. The question is, exactly how much share will it steal from Microsoft's Windows?

Current growth rates suggest Gates and Ballmer do not need to lose too much sleep just yet. Indeed, a bigger concern for them right now is getting existing Windows users to buy into Vista.


Digg this


  Email this entry to a friend

Posted by Jason Stamper on January 7, 2008 03:27 PM

Comments

I would actually not put too much into the numbers of onestat.com. In 2004, June (I think)Google zeitgeist, Linux was used by 1% of the users using Google. And the number should be greater than that now.
But why this obsession with the market share of Linux. It is made for people who have a particular technical or philosophical mindset. It is great. And even its low market share puts it at no risk of extinction. Does it realyy matter if others are not using Linux. The community is doing a good job anyway> My 2 cents.

Posted by: Nilotpal on January 7, 2008 07:24 PM

I do hope Linux will get a greater share of the market for 2008........from a long time Linux user.

Posted by: Vectorpedia(Rick) on January 29, 2008 11:50 AM

Neither MacOS nor Mac OS X are based on the kernel known as Linux. OS X runs on top of Darwin, which in turn uses a derivative of the Mach microkernel.

A number of GNU libraries and utilities have been ported, however, and it may be these you are thinking of. Apple uses a customised version of gcc, the GNU compiler collection, for instance. Still, it would be unusual to describe OS X as based on GNU.

[Jason comments. While MacOS X is not a Linux operating system, is it not widely held that MacOS is based largely on the NeXT operating system, which was itself a Unix-derived operating system based on the Mach kernel?
See: "Mac OS X is based very strongly on a PowerPC-port of OpenStep. Through it Mac OS X inherits Mach’s robust memory and processor management, and device driver interface, BSD’s POSIX - UNIX program protocol - support and networking interface, and NeXT’s OpenSTEP development environment - the Cocoa development environment is a descendent of OpenSTEP - and some of NeXT’s interface elements. NeXT’s interface was based on PostScript, the same technology that makes up the Portable Document Format (PDF) that Mac OS X’s Quartz windowing system is based on. The Mac OS X Dock and Column View are both clearly derived from OpenStep." http://amacgenius.com/archive/125


Posted by: diocles on February 1, 2008 10:25 PM

I suggest that you expand your horizons a little. There are several reputable trackers with very different numbers than OneStat's. A more complete and accurate view can be compiled by analyzing all the numbers. I suggest looking at:

http://www.thecounter.com/stats/

http://www.xitimonitor.com

http://hitslink.marketshare.com

http://www.w3schools.com/browsers/browsers_os.asp

http://www.w3counter.com/globalstats.php


[Jason Stamper comments: a quick look suggests these are tracking browsers, not operating systems? The desktop OS stats look to stand as OneStat called them. There's a difference between someone using an open source browser and someone using a Linux desktop operating system.]

Posted by: sgtrock on February 6, 2008 06:06 PM

Will 2008 be the year of YOUR Linux desktop? 1995 was the year of MINE.

Posted by: Rich3800 on June 23, 2008 02:32 AM

A more accurate picture of market share would be "mind share". Mind share or "what gets people excited?" I think more people, developers and users are excited about Linux than they are about Windows. Linux is where the innovation and excitement are.

Posted by: Rich3800 on June 23, 2008 02:42 AM

Post a comment

Name:

Email Address:

URL:

Remember Me?    Yes     No 

Comments:

Advertisement