Open Source Weblog

When the standards are this low, no one wins
August 31, 2007

This Sunday, September 2, is the deadline for votes from 150 or so national bodies on whether the ECMA standard based on Microsoft Office Open XML formats should be approved by ISO. The result will likely not be known until Monday – and there will likely be no clear winner – but if one side or the other does win out it will be a hollow victory.

CBR has not reported on the machinations involved in the individual country votes, but we have been watching from the sidelines, and it's safe to say the view has not been a pretty one.

The approvals process has been one of the most petty, underhand, deceitful, and childish events I have had the misfortune to witness during ten years in the technology industry. Whatever the outcome there is little to be proud of.

At times it has seemed more like a high school prom Queen election campaign than an approvals process for an international data format standard.

There were reports, for example, of interested parties being denied entry to a meeting in Portugal as the room was too small, despite a larger room being available.

Meanwhile, in Spain, Microsoft was accused by the government of Andalusia of misrepresenting its views on OOXML's potential adoption.

There were also accusations of misleading information being given to national bodies regarding the vote deadline and the way in which comments will be dealt with.

Ballot stuffing by Microsoft partners has been reported in many countries; Norway being one example. Meanwhile Hungary is reportedly reconsidering its yes vote after the voting rules were changed at the last minute.

Meanwhile Microsoft has accused IBM of trying to prevent adoption of OOXML, hyping opposition comments, and attempting to persuade partners to vote against the format.

The bottom of the barrel appears to have been scraped in Sweden where the earlier approval vote has been declared invalid after one of the participating companies voted twice.

Sweden's approval was already shrouded in controversy after a memo surfaced from a Microsoft employee that encouraged partners to sign up and support OOXML in return for “marketing support”.

Whatever the result on Sunday the process will roll on for several more months, and will no doubt get even more acrimonious. Even if OOXML gets approved it will forever be tainted, while the ISO approvals process had also been tarnished by commercial interests.

Microsoft's Jason Matusow recently wrote “at the heart of this remains the idea that making document formats more open is a good thing”. On th contrary, I would argue that the issue of making document formats more open was forgotten long ago.


Digg!

Posted by Matthew Aslett on August 31, 2007 01:58 PM

Comments

Matthew I totally agree with you, the OOXML approval process is a poor show, and worse it definitely put and end to the ISO role, at least in this context.

(Open) Formats are full of hidden traps (follow the URL), and we would need of strong Standard Bodies, willing and able to force standard compliance, just as it happens with manufacturing industry.

In the meantime, China is going its own way, because "international" standards are not fulfilling their specific needs.

Posted by: Roberto Galoppini on August 31, 2007 10:27 PM

All looks like par for the course to me. Welcome to the human race. Humanity's preoccupation with scraping the bottom of the barrel has been on going for centuries. If it comes to an end it will only be by outside intervention.

Posted by: stolennomenclature on September 1, 2007 04:50 AM

You're really surprised? Have you ever used a Microsoft product or tried to deal with their support? Just look at Internet Explorer for an example of a known bad product that continues to be forced down the publics throat year after year with little effort to make it a good product. Look at the tactics Microsoft used to get that product into a dominate market position. Microsoft is known as the evil empire for a reason - they earned it.

Posted by: MikeFM on September 1, 2007 06:41 AM

It is nothing but criminal what Microsoft is doing to continue abusing its monopoly by a Trojan horse that is OOXML. This just can't become a standard, it is a closed format and a technically very bad format, which contradicts a lot of existing ISO standards. Not to mention it has a lot of patented parts so it is just impossible to correctly implement by any other company but Microsoft. What standards organizations should do is reject OOXML and we should all just start supporting a truly open and free existing standard for office documents: Open Document Format (ODF).

Posted by: Tsiolkovsky on September 1, 2007 05:22 PM

Post a comment

Name:

Email Address:

URL:

Remember Me?    Yes     No 

Comments: