Add to Technorati Favorites

Add to My Yahoo!

RECENT ARTICLES

Open Source Blog

Has Xandros also signed a Microsoft patent agreement?
June 04, 2007

A report published (and then withdrawn) over the weekend suggest that Xandros has become the second Linux vendor to strike an interoperability and patent deal with Microsoft. The original eWeek story was here but has been removed it would seem, leaving us with some analysis by Mary Jo Foley and a copy of the original story on WinBeta.org.

According to that report:

“These covenants, which are almost identical to the patent agreement and covenant not to sue that Microsoft signed with Novell last November, will ensure that the Xandros Linux technologies customers use are compliant with Microsoft's IP”

And:

“The collaboration agreements between Microsoft and Xandros, which are valid for five-years and will be announced June 4, also cover a set of technical, business and marketing commitments designed to give customers enhanced interoperability and more effective systems management solutions, he said.

Under the agreement, Microsoft and Xandros will focus on five primary areas over the next five years: systems management interoperability, server interoperability, office document compatibility, sales and marketing support, and IP assurance.”

Until there is some confirmation it would be best speculate too much on this potential deal, although here are two immediate points of interest assuming the reports are accurate:

1. My suggestion that Microsoft could claim to have been prevented from striking similar deals would be moot.

2. Given Section 11 of the last call draft of the GPLv3, (excerpt below) Xandros would be prevented from distributing GPLv3 code:

“A patent license is "discriminatory" if it does not include within the scope of its coverage, prohibits the exercise of, or is conditioned on the non-exercise of one or more of the rights that are specifically granted under this License. You may not convey a covered work if you are a party to an arrangement with a third party that is in the business of distributing software, under which you make payment to the third party based on the extent of your activity of conveying the work, and under which the third party grants, to any of the parties who would receive the covered work from you, a discriminatory patent license (a) in connection with copies of the covered work conveyed by you (or copies made from those copies), or (b) primarily for and in connection with specific products or compilations that contain the covered work, unless you entered into that arrangement, or that patent license was granted, prior to 28 March 2007.”


Digg!


  Email this entry to a friend

Posted by Matthew Aslett on June 4, 2007 11:10 AM

Comments

Post a comment

Name:

Email Address:

URL:

Remember Me?    Yes     No 

Comments:

Advertisement