Add to Technorati Favorites

Add to My Yahoo!

RECENT ARTICLES

Open Source Blog

Microsoft/Novell patent deal – a customer doesn’t speak
March 14, 2007

I recently asked for any Novell or Microsoft customers that feel that their patent covenant agreement gives them peace of mind to step forward and explain to me how the Microsoft/Novell patent deal doesn’t stink?*

Yesterday I got the chance to find out as HSBC, the latest company to accept Microsoft’s offer of SUSE Linux Enterprise Server support certificates, was kind enough to explain its reasons for signing up to the deal.

I asked Matthew O’Neill, group head of distributed systems for HSBC global IT operations, whether he was ever worried about either Microsoft or Novell suing it for using the other company’s products.

Before O’Neill could answer, however, Susan Hauser, general manager of strategic partnerships and licensing at Microsoft, chipped in to answer for him, giving the stock answer that the companies’ customers had concerns about intellectual property and wanted peace of mind.

Well here I was asking the companies’ customer to explain his concerns about intellectual property and he wasn’t being given a chance to speak. Eventually he did make his feelings known, but it would seem HSBC isn’t as concerned about IP infringement as Microsoft.

“It’s a nice to have. I don’t think it was a main feature for me, but it’s nice to have,” he said, adding that it was good not to have to worry about any potential intellectual property infringements.

Not that it sounded like he was that worried about it in the first place – HSBC was already a user of Linux for business critical applications before the Novell/Microsoft deal, and it had already decided to standardize on SUSE Linux Enterprise server.

O’Neill pointed out that HSBC takes its legal requirements very seriously, which is of course true of any business, but does not mean that all legal requirements are considered equally.

“It’s definitely something we consider, but it’s not something that keeps us awake at night,” he added.

The Novell/Microsoft deal clearly has interoperability benefits for customers, as HSBC’s O’Neill also explained, but an explanation of the value of the patent deal still eludes me.

*If you’re a Novell customer, the deal gives you peace of mind that Microsoft won’t sue you, which it wasn’t going to do anyway, for code that may or may not be in Linux, that may or may not infringe Microsoft patents. If you’re a Microsoft customer, the deal gives you peace of mind that Novell won’t sue you, which it wasn’t going to do anyway, for code that may or may not be in Windows, that may or may not infringe Novell patents. No problem, you might think, except that it also provides the opportunity for an awful lot of FUD.


Digg!


  Email this entry to a friend

Posted by Matthew Aslett on March 14, 2007 11:49 AM

Comments

This is exactly why IBM said the patent deal wasn't worth worrying about when it was first made. Sure it gives MS an opportunity to spread FUD. But it has been spreading FUD for years, so what's the big deal? A little more or less FUD isn't going to sway businesses. Although when the SCO/IBM lawsuit first made news, some companies slowed down their Linux purchases. But most companies saw right through it, and sales of Linux kept right on growing.

Posted by: Brian on March 18, 2007 08:33 AM

"We at Microsoft respect Novell's point of view on the patent issue, even while we respectfully take a different view. Novell is absolutely right in stating that it did not admit or acknowledge any patent problems as part of entering into the patent collaboration agreement. At Microsoft we undertook our own analysis of our patent portfolio and concluded that it was necessary and important to create a patent covenant for customers of these products. We are gratified that such a solution is now in place."

Posted by: online casino on May 3, 2007 02:45 PM

Post a comment

Name:

Email Address:

URL:

Remember Me?    Yes     No 

Comments:

Advertisement