
I've only just got round to reading the details of Sun's Project Blackbox data centre-in-a-container idea. While it is an interesting concept, the suggestion that it could be the solution to powering humanitarian relief efforts is disingenuous, not to say condescending.

Blackbox is basically a 20-foot cargo shipping container that is stuffed with computing power. As such it represents a new flexible approach to data centre.
According to Sun, "housed in a standard 20-foot shipping container for maximum flexibility, Project Blackbox will be easily transported using common shipping methods." All you need is to connect up power, networking and chilled water for cooling.
"What does the CIO in midtown Manhattan do when she runs out of roof space or power?" Asks Sun CEO, Jonathan Schwartz. "How does an aid agency deliver basic connectivity to 5,000 relief workers in a tsunami stricken metropolis? What does an oil company do when they want to move high performance analytics onto an offshore platform or supertanker? Or a large web services company do when they want to cookie cutter their infrastructure next to a hyrdroelectric plant for cheap power - within weeks, not years?"
Hang on a minute - "a tsunami stricken metropolis"? Apparently so. "You can place them on offshore oil rigs. In disaster areas. In remote locations without infrastructure. To wherever they're most needed," continues Schwartz.
Let's think about that for a minute. A humanitarian crisis hits a "tsunami stricken metropolis" turning it into a disaster area, and Sun wants to use available water to drive a mobile data center? I'm no humanitarian aid worker but I had the vague idea that in such a situation water - let alone chilled water - is something of a valuable commodity.
It may only have been photoshopped for illustrative purposes but the above picture is in questionable taste, and is clearly misleading when you consider Sun has as much chance of getting a Blackbox running in such a remote environment as it does sending one to Mars.
It's not disingenuous, it's reflective of our experience in hurricane Katrina, where we managed a large scale SunRay deployment on behalf of relief workers - and were recognzied by the Red Cross for the effort. We're now in touch with many relief agencies to prepare similar solutions on a more rapid basis.
And although I agree, we probably shouldn't have mixed the metaphors, the water that goes in to a chiller doesn't need to be potable. So it doesn't exacerbate hydration issues.
Thanks for the response Jonathan. It's good to hear that the technology can be put to good use.
I still think the above picture is misleading. Over-selling processing power or software features is one thing, but over-selling potential aid uses is another.