<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed>
    <title>Jason Stamper&apos;s Blog</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.businessreviewonline.com/blog/" />
    <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.businessreviewonline.com/blog/atom.xml" />
    <id>tag:www.businessreviewonline.com,2009-11-24:/blog//1</id>
    <updated>2010-02-09T11:17:26Z</updated>
    
    <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.32-en</generator>

<entry>
    <title>SOA Software expands in face of AmberPoint acquisition by Oracle</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.businessreviewonline.com/blog/archives/2010/02/#002697" />    


    <updated>2010-02-09T11:17:26Z</updated>

    <summary>It&apos;s not easy being a small, services oriented architecture (SOA) management and governance player. But if anyone was wondering about the likely longevity of this tiny niche, or whether it will simply be subsumed into broader systems management or business service management frameworks, SOA Software has news for you. Yesterday it was announced that probably its nearest rival, AmberPoint, would be acquired by Oracle; yet today SOA Software announced that it is not withering but expanding. The firm claims it grew revenue 55% last year and made an operating profit. Now it says it&apos;s expanding its European presence with the...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Jason Stamper</name>
        <uri>http://www.cbronline.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    <category term="ibm" label="IBM" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="oracle" label="Oracle" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="redhat" label="Red Hat" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="serviceorientedarchitecture" label="Service-oriented architecture" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.businessreviewonline.com/blog/">
        <![CDATA[<p>It's not easy being a small, services oriented architecture (SOA) management and governance player. But if anyone was wondering about the likely longevity of this tiny niche, or whether it will simply be subsumed into broader systems management or business service management frameworks, SOA Software has news for you.</p>

<p>Yesterday it was announced that probably its nearest rival, AmberPoint, would be <A href="http://www.cbronline.com/news/oracle_to_acquire_soa_management_vendor_amberpoint_100208">acquired by Oracle</A>; yet today SOA Software announced that it is not withering but expanding. The firm claims it grew revenue 55% last year and made an operating profit. </p>

<p>Now it says it's expanding its European presence with the appointment of Steve Pope as VP of Europe, and Simon Parker as director technology Europe, to, "Support and drive the company's rapid growth in the European markets".</p>

<p>SOA Software counts IBM, Microsoft, JBoss (Red Hat) and SAP among its alliance partners. No surprise that Oracle's not on that list, especially after yesterday's news.</p>

<p>On balance though, one can't help wondering whether this little segment is long for this world. SOA projects are never undertaken for their own sake and nearly always suck in other elements that may need more traditional systems or service management capabilities anyway. So won't this type of technology just become part of broader suites, as being suggested by Oracle with its AmberPoint buy?</p>

<p></p>

<p><br />
<DIV class=zemanta-pixie style="MARGIN-TOP: 10px; HEIGHT: 15px"><A class=zemanta-pixie-a title="Reblog this post [with Zemanta]" href="http://reblog.zemanta.com/zemified/5baa13a6-c4d3-4737-b320-afa78a9d4514/"><IMG class=zemanta-pixie-img style="BORDER-RIGHT: medium none; BORDER-TOP: medium none; FLOAT: right; BORDER-LEFT: medium none; BORDER-BOTTOM: medium none" alt="Reblog this post [with Zemanta]" src="http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=5baa13a6-c4d3-4737-b320-afa78a9d4514"></A><SPAN class="zem-script more-related pretty-attribution"><SCRIPT src="http://static.zemanta.com/readside/loader.js" defer="defer" type="text/javascript"></SCRIPT></SPAN></DIV></p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>CBR Podcast: Novell CEO on his bold new strategy</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.businessreviewonline.com/blog/archives/2010/02/#002636" />    


    <updated>2010-02-04T20:02:42Z</updated>

    <summary>I caught up with the president and CEO of Novell, Ron Hovsepian recently, to find out more about the company&apos;s recently announced Intelligent Workload Management strategy. Of course, I also took the opportunity to ask whether he still believes that the firm&apos;s controversial agreement with Microsoft on Windows-Linux interoperability and virtualisation was in the firm&apos;s best interests, considering how the open source community reacted to the deal for the most part (angrily). And needless to say I asked for his thoughts on the firm&apos;s latest results. Anyway to listen to the podcast click the link below (there&apos;s an approximate timeline...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Jason Stamper</name>
        <uri>http://www.cbronline.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    <category term="hovsepian" label="Hovsepian" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="linux" label="Linux" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="microsoft" label="Microsoft" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="novell" label="Novell" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.businessreviewonline.com/blog/">
        <![CDATA[<p>I caught up with the president and CEO of Novell, Ron Hovsepian recently, to find out more about the company's recently announced Intelligent Workload Management strategy. </p>

<p>Of course, I also took the opportunity to ask whether he still believes that the firm's controversial agreement with Microsoft on Windows-Linux interoperability and virtualisation was in the firm's best interests, considering how the open source community reacted to the deal for the most part (angrily).</p>

<p>And needless to say I asked for his thoughts on the firm's latest results. </p>

<p>Anyway to listen to the podcast click the link below (there's an approximate timeline of the questions below if you want to skip to a particular segment):<br />
<a href="http://www.businessreviewonline.com/blog/podcasts/Ron%20Hovsepian%20%20Novell%20CEO%20Podcast.wma">Ron Hovsepian  Novell CEO Podcast.wma</a></p>

<p></p>

<p><img alt="Ron Hovsepian.jpg" src="http://www.businessreviewonline.com/blog/Ron%20Hovsepian.jpg" width="80" height="100" class="mt-image-none" style="" /><br />
<em>Ron Hovsepian, president and CEO of Novell.</em></p>

<p>0.22: Can you tell me what you are most proud of at Novell during your tensure as President and CEO thus far?</p>

<p>1.55: One of the more controversial decisions since you've been CEO was to sign that interoperability agreement with Microsoft. Knowing what you know now about the open source commmunity's reaction, was that the right move for Novell?</p>

<p>4.12: How pleased are you with Linux platform revenue, and is it doing enough to make up for [any declines] in Novell's more mature product categories?</p>

<p>5.25: You acquired PlateSpin and Managed Objects... can you explain what your recently announced Intelligent Workload Management strategy is all about?</p>

<p>9.15: Can you put some more detail around specific products in those four key areas: Build, Manage, Secure and Measure?</p>

<p>16.45: Is the sales decline in Novell's most recent quarter (Q4 revenue 09 was $216m, down from $245m in Q4 '08) purely down to the economic environment, or are there areas you have identified where you need to improve your execution?</p>

<p>19.00: Novell has plenty of cash in the bank; how keenly will you look at acquisitions in 2010?</p>

<p>20.30: The average tenure of a CEO is about 5 years; do you feel that you have plenty more you can do at Novell, to regain some of that growth?</p>

<p></p>

<p><br />
</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>The magic of iPad</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.businessreviewonline.com/blog/archives/2010/01/#002614" />    


    <updated>2010-01-29T17:06:21Z</updated>

    <summary> Source: GlobalX on Flickr....</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Jason Stamper</name>
        <uri>http://www.cbronline.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    <category term="apple" label="Apple" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="ipad" label="iPad" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.businessreviewonline.com/blog/">
        <![CDATA[<p><img alt="iPad pic.jpg" src="http://www.businessreviewonline.com/blog/iPad%20pic.jpg" width="300" height="300" class="mt-image-none" style="" /><br />
<em>Source: GlobalX on Flickr.</em></p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>The 10 biggest iPad disappointments</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.businessreviewonline.com/blog/archives/2010/01/#002612" />    


    <updated>2010-01-29T15:32:33Z</updated>

    <summary>The much-hyped launch of Apple&apos;s new tablet-style computer on Wednesday has done little to change my belief that it&apos;s a solution looking for a problem. Apple CEO Steve Jobs, in trademark black turtle-neck sweater, said, &quot;iPad creates and defines an entirely new category of devices that will connect users with their apps and content in a much more intimate, intuitive and fun way than ever before.&quot; Getty Images. Creating a new category in the fast-moving electronics industry is no mean feat. Let&apos;s not forget that despite its numerous successes, even Apple has not always been able to do that. There...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Jason Stamper</name>
        <uri>http://www.cbronline.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    <category term="appstore" label="App Store" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="apple" label="Apple" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="appleappstore" label="Apple App Store" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="iphone" label="iPhone" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="itunes" label="iTunes" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="itunesstore" label="ITunes Store" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="sony" label="Sony" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.businessreviewonline.com/blog/">
        <![CDATA[<p>The much-hyped launch of Apple's new tablet-style computer on Wednesday has done little to change my belief that it's a solution looking for a problem.</p>

<p>Apple CEO Steve Jobs, in trademark black turtle-neck sweater, said, "iPad creates and defines an entirely new category of devices that will connect users with their apps and content in a much more intimate, intuitive and fun way than ever before."</p>

<p><br />
<IMG class=mt-image-none height=140 alt=20100128_96211164_w.jpg src="http://www.businessreviewonline.com/blog/20100128_96211164_w.jpg" width=220><br />
<em>Getty Images.</em></p>

<p>Creating a new category in the fast-moving electronics industry is no mean feat. Let's not forget that despite its numerous successes, even Apple has not always been able to do that. There were portable music players before the iPod, and smartphones before the iPhone. There weren't many square computers before its G4 Cube, but then that product bombed anyway.</p>

<p>Is the iPad really a brand new category of device?</p>

<p>I fail to see that it is. As we've established, tablet computers have been around for many years. What makes the iPad drastically different? It runs a different operating system (most others run Windows or Linux) and because it's from Apple, integrates well with the likes of Apple's iTunes and its online iBookstore, and can run all the apps than run on the iPhone. That's about the long and short of it.</p>

<p>Apple's says the iPad is a "magical and revolutionary device at an unbelievable price". But who really needs it? iPhone users already have access to the thousands of apps in the Apple App Store (not to mention an existing subscription to a telecoms operator). Anyone with a laptop, notebook or netbook has large-screen portable computing nailed, with the advantage of a folding keyboard that protects the screen from scratches and knocks and is more familiar and faster than the iPad's on-screen touch keyboard.</p>

<p>Much has been made of the argument that it will revolutionise publishing because you can download thousands of books, or read newspapers on it in glorious full colour. Sure, for a few hours. While Apple claims "up to 10 hours" of battery life you're unlikely to see that in real-world situations, especially once you have a number of battery-hungry apps running from the App Store and are using Wi-Fi or 3G connectivity in anger.</p>

<p>Compare battery life to the e-reader competition: the Kindle from Amazon claims the battery will last 7 days from a single charge, while Sony's eReader measures battery life as up to 7,500 continuous page turns. So it's not a direct e-reader competitor, if all you want to do is read digital books on the move.</p>

<p>I'm sorry, but I still don't quite get it. I clearly don't believe in magic. As I've also said before, people will buy this thing. That's the cult of Mac.</p>

<p>Anyway for my pick of the top 10 iPad disappointments read the <A href="http://www.newstatesman.com/blogs/the-staggers/2010/01/apple-ipad-battery-screen-apps">extended entry here</A>.</p>

<p></p>

<p><DIV class=zemanta-pixie style="MARGIN-TOP: 10px; HEIGHT: 15px"><A class=zemanta-pixie-a title="Reblog this post [with Zemanta]" href="http://reblog.zemanta.com/zemified/dd440692-5e14-453a-b86e-3cf72a40343e/"><IMG class=zemanta-pixie-img style="BORDER-RIGHT: medium none; BORDER-TOP: medium none; FLOAT: right; BORDER-LEFT: medium none; BORDER-BOTTOM: medium none" alt="Reblog this post [with Zemanta]" src="http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=dd440692-5e14-453a-b86e-3cf72a40343e"></A><SPAN class="zem-script more-related pretty-attribution"><SCRIPT src="http://static.zemanta.com/readside/loader.js" defer="defer" type="text/javascript"></SCRIPT></SPAN></DIV></p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Gartner assures us Apple is launching tablet style Mac tomorrow</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.businessreviewonline.com/blog/archives/2010/01/#002589" />    


    <updated>2010-01-27T09:16:03Z</updated>

    <summary>If anyone was wondering whether all the hype about a possible Apple tablet computer -- variously being called the iSlate or iPad -- was just a spoiler and that the firm may not launch something after all, you might want to think again. Analyst firm Gartner, which is likely to have its ear pretty close to the ground on this one, is admant that some kind of slate will be launched at the Apple event at the Yerba Buena Center for the Arts Theater in San Francisco tomorrow. One interpretation of what the iSlate might look like. Source: Cult of...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Jason Stamper</name>
        <uri>http://www.cbronline.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    <category term="apple" label="Apple" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="smartphone" label="Smartphone" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="tablets" label="Tablets" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="yerbabuenacenter" label="Yerba Buena Center" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="yerbabuenacenterforthearts" label="Yerba Buena Center for the Arts" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.businessreviewonline.com/blog/">
        <![CDATA[<p>If anyone was wondering whether all the hype about a possible Apple tablet computer -- variously being called the iSlate or iPad -- was just a spoiler and that the firm may not launch something after all, you might want to think again.</p>

<p>Analyst firm Gartner, which is likely to have its ear pretty close to the ground on this one, is admant that some kind of slate will be launched at the Apple event at the Yerba Buena Center for the Arts Theater in San Francisco tomorrow.</p>

<p><img alt="apple-macintosh-tablet-2.jpg" src="http://www.businessreviewonline.com/blog/apple-macintosh-tablet-2.jpg" width="255" height="181" class="mt-image-none" style="" /><br />
<em>One interpretation of what the iSlate might look like. Source: Cult of Mac.</em></p>

<p>The analyst firm has sent round a list of analyst contacts it says can offer comment to the media on the day, which is quite telling in itself:</p>

<p>"Carolina Milanesi, Gartner Research Director can comment on the hardware and its positioning within both the Apple portfolio and the connected devices market from smartphones to notebooks."</p>

<p>"Charles Smulders, Gartner Managing Vice President can comment on the product's positioning within the Apple portfolio and the client device market in general."</p>

<p>"Van Baker, Gartner Research VP can comment on the viability and usability of the product and the likely consumer reaction as well how it relates to the overall tablet market."</p>

<p>"Mike McGuire, Gartner Research VP can comment on content capabilities and significance of the device to media companies and rights holders."</p>

<p>Meanwhile CBR's Jason Stamper can comment on why whatever Apple launches, he <A href="http://www.businessreviewonline.com/blog/archives/2010/01/why-im-slating.html">won't be buying it</A>.</p>

<p></p>

<p></p>

<p></p>

<p></p>

<p><DIV style="MARGIN-TOP: 10px; HEIGHT: 15px" class=zemanta-pixie><A class=zemanta-pixie-a title="Reblog this post [with Zemanta]" href="http://reblog.zemanta.com/zemified/12845799-72a5-4db6-9a21-416a09f015cc/"><IMG style="BORDER-BOTTOM: medium none; BORDER-LEFT: medium none; FLOAT: right; BORDER-TOP: medium none; BORDER-RIGHT: medium none" class=zemanta-pixie-img alt="Reblog this post [with Zemanta]" src="http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=12845799-72a5-4db6-9a21-416a09f015cc"></A><SPAN class="zem-script more-related pretty-attribution"><SCRIPT type="text/javascript" defer="defer" src="http://static.zemanta.com/readside/loader.js"></SCRIPT></SPAN></DIV></p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Morning Roundup: pick of the comment</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.businessreviewonline.com/blog/archives/2010/01/#002583" />    


    <updated>2010-01-25T10:12:10Z</updated>

    <summary>Our pick of the best of the morning reading Why I will wait in line again (Scobleizer) Web watcher Robert Scoble outlines why he&apos;ll be first in line when Apple&apos;s mystery device finally goes on sale. Apple Tablet: The Second Stage Media Booster Rocket (Flurry) The eagerly-awaited tablet has been spotted in the wild! Mobile app analysis firm Flurry claims that about 50 devices are in use on Apple&apos;s Cupertino campus and takes a look at what they are being used for. Bill Gates launches his own website (The Telegraph) Microsoft founder Bill Gates starts his own website to keep...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Jason Stamper</name>
        <uri>http://www.cbronline.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    <category term="apple" label="Apple" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="microsoft" label="Microsoft" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="robertscoble" label="Robert Scoble" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="socialnetwork" label="Social network" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.businessreviewonline.com/blog/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Our pick of the best of the morning reading</p>

<p><A href="http://scobleizer.com/2010/01/25/why-i-will-wait-in-line-again/">Why I will wait in line again</A> (Scobleizer)<br />
Web watcher Robert Scoble outlines why he'll be first in line when Apple's mystery device finally goes on sale.</p>

<p><A href="http://blog.flurry.com/bid/30019/Apple-Tablet-The-Second-Stage-Media-Booster-Rocket">Apple Tablet: The Second Stage Media Booster Rocket</A> (Flurry)<br />
The eagerly-awaited tablet has been spotted in the wild! Mobile app analysis firm Flurry claims that about 50 devices are in use on Apple's Cupertino campus and takes a look at what they are being used for.</p>

<p><A href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/microsoft/7054951/Bill-Gates-launches-his-own-website.html">Bill Gates launches his own website</A> (The Telegraph)<br />
Microsoft founder Bill Gates starts his own website to keep us up to date on his current life and work. The announcement comes days after he joined social networking site Twitter.</p>

<p><A href="http://www.businessreviewonline.com/blog/archives/2010/01/why-im-slating.html">Will no one slate the iSlate?</A> (CBR) <br />
As the countdown continues to Apple's event on Wednesday, where the firm is expected to announce a tablet computer, CBR editor Jason Stamper cuts through the rumours to ask whether all the hype is really justified.</p>

<p><A href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2010/jan/22/internet-explorer-nhs-vulnerability">Why the NHS can't get its browser act together</A> (The Guardian)<br />
Organisational inertia means we're saddled with an ageing, vulnerable browser across our hospitals and key government departments. That's not good, says Charles Arthur.</p>

<p></p>

<p><DIV style="MARGIN-TOP: 10px; HEIGHT: 15px" class=zemanta-pixie><A class=zemanta-pixie-a title="Reblog this post [with Zemanta]" href="http://reblog.zemanta.com/zemified/2a1b85dd-17fa-4abb-b2a1-6ab2d6338f52/"><IMG style="BORDER-BOTTOM: medium none; BORDER-LEFT: medium none; FLOAT: right; BORDER-TOP: medium none; BORDER-RIGHT: medium none" class=zemanta-pixie-img alt="Reblog this post [with Zemanta]" src="http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=2a1b85dd-17fa-4abb-b2a1-6ab2d6338f52"></A><SPAN class="zem-script more-related pretty-attribution"><SCRIPT type="text/javascript" defer="defer" src="http://static.zemanta.com/readside/loader.js"></SCRIPT></SPAN></DIV></p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Why I&apos;m slating the iSlate</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.businessreviewonline.com/blog/archives/2010/01/#002580" />    


    <updated>2010-01-25T09:20:33Z</updated>

    <summary>Amongst the thousands of news articles and blogs gushing over the anticipated launch of an Apple tablet computer next week - possibly called the iSlate or iPad, or neither - it&apos;s perhaps worth taking stock of the situation and asking whether all this hype is really justified. The concept of a tablet or slate PC is not new. They&apos;ve been around for about 10 years, and it&apos;s a format that came to the mainstream thanks to a product announcement by Microsoft in 2001, which saw the Redmond-based firm launch a pen-enabled computer running a licensed copy of the &quot;Windows XP...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Jason Stamper</name>
        <uri>http://www.cbronline.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    <category term="apple" label="Apple" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="laptop" label="Laptop" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="microsoft" label="Microsoft" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="netbook" label="Netbook" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="tablet" label="tablet" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="touchscreen" label="Touchscreen" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.businessreviewonline.com/blog/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Amongst the thousands of news articles and blogs gushing over the anticipated launch of an Apple tablet computer next week - possibly called the iSlate or iPad, or neither - it's perhaps worth taking stock of the situation and asking whether all this hype is really justified.</p>

<p><img alt="20100122_apple-logo-getty_w.jpg" src="http://www.businessreviewonline.com/blog/20100122_apple-logo-getty_w.jpg" width="220.5" height="140" class="mt-image-none" style="" /></p>

<p>The concept of a tablet or slate PC is not new. They've been around for about 10 years, and it's a format that came to the mainstream thanks to a product announcement by Microsoft in 2001, which saw the Redmond-based firm launch a pen-enabled computer running a licensed copy of the "Windows XP Tablet PC Edition".</p>

<p>It was essentially a laptop-style device that featured a touch-screen with handwriting recognition, to make it easier to jot down notes, rush off a quick sketch or whatever. Some manufacturers opted to stay with the laptop's physical keyboard, spawning a category known as "booklets", while others dropped the keyboard in favour of just a touch screen in a device resembling a slate.</p>

<p>So first off, let's just remind ourselves who brought this concept to the masses - Microsoft - before we wonder whether Apple's version will "change the world" as some commentators are suggesting.</p>

<p>Second, it's worth noting that so far, such tablets have found only a limited audience. A recent Morgan Stanley report suggested two million tablet PCs were shipped last year, compared with 34 million netbooks and 131 million notebooks.</p>

<p>So why hasn't the concept of a tablet PC overtaken more traditional laptops, notebooks or indeed the latest netbooks already? Wikipedia has a fairly comprehensive list of disadvantages including the higher cost, snail-like speed of handwriting recognition compared to a keyboard, screen and hinge damage risk, less familiar ergonomics and in most cases a relative lack of power.</p>

<p>So if Apple launches a tablet-style Mac next week, will it change any of this? I sincerely doubt it. To read the rest of this article click <a href="http://www.newstatesman.com/blogs/the-staggers/2010/01/apple-tablet-islate-screen">here</a>.</p>

<p><br />
<A href="javascript:location.href='http://digg.com/submit?phase=2&amp;url='+encodeURIComponent(document.location.href)+' '">Digg this</A></p>

<p><br />
<DIV class=zemanta-pixie style="MARGIN-TOP: 10px; HEIGHT: 15px"><A class=zemanta-pixie-a title="Reblog this post [with Zemanta]" href="http://reblog.zemanta.com/zemified/ee769276-d448-4124-a90b-6ce60956d222/"><IMG class=zemanta-pixie-img style="BORDER-RIGHT: medium none; BORDER-TOP: medium none; FLOAT: right; BORDER-LEFT: medium none; BORDER-BOTTOM: medium none" alt="Reblog this post [with Zemanta]" src="http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=ee769276-d448-4124-a90b-6ce60956d222"></A><SPAN class="zem-script more-related pretty-attribution"><SCRIPT src="http://static.zemanta.com/readside/loader.js" defer="defer" type="text/javascript"></SCRIPT></SPAN></DIV></p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Should Google have done more about China years ago?</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.businessreviewonline.com/blog/archives/2010/01/#002539" />    


    <updated>2010-01-13T16:58:48Z</updated>

    <summary>Action over China is long overdue There are around 1.3 billion people who live in China, not one of whom is likely to be able to read this blog. That&apos;s got less to do with whether Google opts to pull its operations out of China, and more to do with the &apos;Great Firewall of China&apos; in particular, and the Chinese regime&apos;s lack of respect for freedom of speech in general. Nevertheless, it must be increasingly difficult for Google to defend its decision to operate in China, and in so doing comply with the Chinese authorities&apos; insistence that the search engine...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Jason Stamper</name>
        <uri>http://www.cbronline.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    <category term="google" label="Google" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="googlechinese" label="Google Chinese" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="greatfirewallofchina" label="Great Firewall of China" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="websearchengine" label="Web search engine" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.businessreviewonline.com/blog/">
        <![CDATA[<p><EM>Action over China is long overdue </EM></p>

<p>There are around 1.3 billion people who live in China, not one of whom is likely to be able to read this blog. That's got less to do with whether Google opts to pull its operations out of China, and more to do with the 'Great Firewall of China' in particular, and the Chinese regime's lack of respect for freedom of speech in general.</p>

<p>Nevertheless, it must be increasingly difficult for Google to defend its decision to operate in China, and in so doing comply with the Chinese authorities' insistence that the search engine giant, too, censor the search results that the people of China are able to see.</p>

<p>Indeed, Google's decision to open an office in China made it a mere pawn in China's attempts to repress free speech. No surprise, then, that Google's decision to operate in China was widely criticised when it was first announced. Had Google been around during the Apartheid years of South Africa - which saw the censorship of books, magazines and other literature deemed destabilising by the then South African government - one must wonder whether Google would have operated there if it meant helping to enforce such restrictions, and thereby helping to repress freedom of speech and the anti-Apartheid movement.</p>

<p>So the fact that Google is <A href="http://www.cbronline.com/news/google_threatens_china_withdrawal_over_cyber_attack_130110">only now threatening to pull out of China </A>- and only after serious cyber-attacks on Google and 30 other Silicon Valley firms - will do little to reassure civil liberties campaigners. They justifiably argue that Google, in its dealings with China so far, has done little more than put its profits above all else.</p>

<p>To continue reading this blog entry <A href="http://www.newstatesman.com/blogs/the-staggers/2010/01/chinese-search-china-google">click here</A>. </p>

<p></p>

<p></p>

<p><DIV style="MARGIN-TOP: 10px; HEIGHT: 15px" class=zemanta-pixie><A class=zemanta-pixie-a title="Reblog this post [with Zemanta]" href="http://reblog.zemanta.com/zemified/03b78204-8365-4bda-b963-d3abc9b9eac5/"><IMG style="BORDER-BOTTOM: medium none; BORDER-LEFT: medium none; FLOAT: right; BORDER-TOP: medium none; BORDER-RIGHT: medium none" class=zemanta-pixie-img alt="Reblog this post [with Zemanta]" src="http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=03b78204-8365-4bda-b963-d3abc9b9eac5"></A><SPAN class="zem-script more-related pretty-attribution"><SCRIPT type="text/javascript" defer="defer" src="http://static.zemanta.com/readside/loader.js"></SCRIPT></SPAN></DIV></p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Progress Software buys BPM player Savvion</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.businessreviewonline.com/blog/archives/2010/01/#002535" />    


    <updated>2010-01-11T13:19:34Z</updated>

    <summary>Hot on the heels of news that IBM is buying business process management company Lombardi, Progress Software has announced it is buying fellow BPM firm Savvion. Savvion is a privately held software company based in Santa Clara, California. Progress is buying the firm for around $49 million, net of cash acquired. Savvion has15 years of market experience. The company offers what Progress calls a comprehensive, standards-based BPM suite that helps around 300 of the world&apos;s companies - including 24 of the &apos;Fortune 100&apos; - automate and improve critical business processes. Dr John Bates, CTO of Progress Software, told me on...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Jason Stamper</name>
        <uri>http://www.cbronline.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.businessreviewonline.com/blog/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Hot on the heels of news that IBM is buying business process management company Lombardi, Progress Software has announced it is buying fellow BPM firm Savvion.</p>

<p>Savvion is a privately held software company based in Santa Clara, California. Progress is buying the firm for around $49 million, net of cash acquired. </p>

<p>Savvion has15 years of market experience.  The company offers what Progress calls a comprehensive, standards-based BPM suite that helps around 300 of the world's companies - including 24 of the 'Fortune 100' - automate and improve critical business processes. </p>

<p>Dr John Bates, CTO of Progress Software, told me on a call not 15 minutes ago that the reason for picking Savvion rather than another BPM provider is that: "Savvion is a great fit for a number of reasons: it's a very rich product, and the BPM platform is events based." Progress, remember, has a complex event processing (CEP) product called Apama, and Bates hinted that there could be scope for some integration there.</p>

<p>As for why now was the right time for Savvion to sell, Dr. M.A. Ketabchi, founder, president and CEO of Savvion, told me: "We have a large customer base of leading enterprises, and for them BPM is increasingly becoming more critical, with more complex solutions. For Savvion to offer them multi-national support I thought we needed several years to get there, and by then it would be too late."</p>

<p>Dr Ketabchi said that wheen seeking a buyer, he wanted to find a company where Savvion would fit well pretty much straight away, so that, "Customers do not face disruption like Lombardi customers will face at IBM" -- IBM announced it is buying Lombardi just before Christmas.</p>

<p>Asked to summarise Savvion's key differentiators from the BPM competition, Dr Ketabchi said: "The first thing is the extent and scope of our functionality: for example our BPM comes out of the box with a business rules management system, which Lombardi does not. IBM has the Ilog business rules but there is no integration between Ilog and Lombardi."</p>

<p>"Second, we made sure our BPM is enterprise BPM -- Lombardi, Metastorm and those others are departmental BPM. Our BPM is event-centric and supports event-centric patterns, decision-centric operations, case management and so on," Dr Ketabchi told me. "And thirdly we are unique among the companies you mentioned in that we have very efficient, very effective solutions tailored to verticals, such as a Telecom Foundation and a Life Sciences Foundation."</p>

<p>Meanwhile Dr Bates confirmed that one area where additional integration might make sense is between Progress' Sonic enterprise service bus (ESB) messaging technology and Savvion.</p>

<p>As for what Dr Ketabchi thinks about Lombardi's Blueprint hosted modeling tool, he said: "Actually Lombardi Blueprint is hosted but it's not BPM in any way. We believe BPM solutions on demand will be very important, but Blueprint is just a hosted modeler.</p>

<p>"We have been delivering hosted BPM through partners for some time," Dr Ketabchi said. "We have very exciting plans ahead and lots of innovative ideas for hosted modeling and BPM on demand." Dr Bates added that it is too early to give further details on those plans just yet.</p>

<p>Dr Ketabchi confirmed that he is "committed" to work for Progress now, though exact details of what his position will be are yet to be determined. </p>

<p>Dr Bates said Progress Software wants to become a, "Leading BPM player in its own right", because "that's what we're hearing customers say they want and where we think it is going. Customers are asking for us to help make their business processes more responsive , and we of course want to make our customers successful."</p>

<p>Dr Ketabchi told me that Savvion has been profitable for the last 8 quarters, and that he believes the purchase price of $59m is "fair".</p>

<p>More from the press release: </p>

<p>Richard D. Reidy, president and chief executive officer, Progress Software said: "We believe that achieving operational responsiveness has become a business imperative, enabling businesses to achieve the highest level of operational performance. Our acquisition of Savvion enhances our goal to provide unprecedented business visibility, responsiveness and business process improvement, coupled with the highest degree of data integrity and integration."</p>

<p>Dr. John Bates, Progress Software's chief technology officer and head of corporate development added: "The Savvion BPM suite is a perfect fit for Progress because it offers leading capabilities for business process modeling and execution. The suite also uniquely includes other integrated key capabilities, including business rules management, document management, an event engine and an analytics engine." </p>

<p>Dr. Bates continued: "In addition, Savvion has developed powerful industry-specific BPM solutions for financial services, communications, healthcare, life sciences, energy and manufacturing industries in which, Progress already has a broad customer base that will benefit from these capabilities.  Each Savvion solution features pre-built business processes and dashboards based on industry best practices. These solutions are proven to accelerate customer deployments with a high return on investment (ROI) and a low total cost of ownership (TCO)."</p>

<p>Sandep Phanasgaonkar, president and CTO, Reliance Capital noted: "The Savvion BPM suite has quick deployment time. Reliance reduced turnaround time and increased adherence to SLAs after implementing the Savvion BPM solution.  Savvion helped create an 86% reduction in policy generation time. Our ROI was realized in less than six months."</p>

<p>According to Maureen Fleming, program director of IDC's business process management and middleware research service: "As enterprises increase their focus on operational responsiveness - and most of them are -- there is a need to build event-driven systems that adapt continuously to current and trending business conditions. We call these 'business navigation systems,' which converge visibility, event processing and BPM software.  Vendors offering all three capabilities as a system are in a much stronger position to partner with their customers to build these new types of high value applications."<br />
 <br />
The combination of Progress Software's Business Event Processing (BEP), Business Transaction Assurance (BTA) and Integration portfolio, coupled with the Savvion BPM suite better enables enterprises to achieve the highest levels of operational responsiveness.  With this set of solutions, enterprises can: <br />
1.     Ensure efficient execution of business processes by detecting system bottle-necks through visibility into process transactions and resolving;</p>

<p>2.    Capture, analyze and respond to opportunities and threats to the business through business event processing in real-time; </p>

<p>3.    Easily integrate existing disparate systems and processes; and, </p>

<p>4.    Achieve end-to-end business process visibility to detect and resolve any system bottlenecks and exceptions ensuring every business process is completed successfully.</p>

<p>Progress Software is providing the following guidance, which reflects the anticipated impact from the acquisition of Savvion, for the first fiscal quarter ending February 28, 2010:</p>

<p>GAAP revenue is expected to be in the range of $124 million to $128 million. <br />
Revenue, on a non-GAAP basis, is expected to be in the range of $125 million to $129 million. <br />
GAAP diluted earnings per share are expected to be in the range of a loss of 20 cents to a loss of 1 cent. <br />
On a non-GAAP basis, diluted earnings per share are expected to be in the range of 44 cents to 46 cents. </p>

<p>The outlook for the non-GAAP amounts excludes the amortization of acquired intangibles, stock-based compensation, purchase accounting adjustments for deferred revenue, restructuring charges and acquisition-related expenses.</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Remote working could avoid snowy absenteeism, but at what cost?</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.businessreviewonline.com/blog/archives/2010/01/#002524" />    


    <updated>2010-01-06T14:00:26Z</updated>

    <summary>It kind of goes without saying, but I guess someone had to say it: if your staff can work equally well remotely, they won&apos;t add to the absenteeism roster just because the UK has seen some snow. That was the revelation from ntl:Telewest Business today. The firm points out that remote working could help businesses to continue operating despite unexpected events, such as snow. &quot;The British weather seems to be getting even less predictable placing greater emphasis on organisations to have a continuity plan in place to ensure that operations do not hit a standstill when the worst happens,&quot; said...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Jason Stamper</name>
        <uri>http://www.cbronline.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.businessreviewonline.com/blog/">
        <![CDATA[<p>It kind of goes without saying, but I guess someone had to say it: if your staff can work equally well remotely, they won't add to the absenteeism roster just because the UK has seen some snow. That was the revelation from ntl:Telewest Business today.</p>

<p>The firm points out that remote working could help businesses to continue operating despite unexpected events, such as snow.</p>

<p>"The British weather seems to be getting even less predictable placing greater emphasis on organisations to have a continuity plan in place to ensure that operations do not hit a standstill when the worst happens," said Andrew McGrath, commercial director of ntl:Telewest Business. "Severe snow always means travel disruption whereby employees cannot make it in to the office - in fact, business groups have estimated that the cost of absenteeism to the economy because of this week's snowfalls could reach £2 billion."</p>

<p>"Businesses can prepare for this with a remote working policy so that employees can still be productive and continue their work, wherever they are," McGrath addded.</p>

<p>Still, the many who secretly hope for heavy snow in order to get a precious day off, would be disappointed if travel chaos had little impact on their working day. Still, there's always the option of pulling a 'sickie' if you are desperate to get the sledge out. Is there such a thing as 'snow-itis'?</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>BT may go to court over digital spectrum plans</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.businessreviewonline.com/blog/archives/2009/12/#002522" />    


    <updated>2010-01-05T18:32:39Z</updated>

    <summary>The British government&apos;s plans for providing fast broadband internet connection to each and every British household by 2012 -- in part by extending mobile broadband licenses to incumbent mobile operators -- have caused some concern at BT. BT said yesterday it could even take legal action against the government if it goes ahead with its plans. BT sent a &quot;letter before action&quot; to the business secretary Lord Mandelson, in which the company took issue with the idea that the available wireless spectrum licenses be extended to incumbent mobile operators without a spectrum auction. A spokesperson explained: &quot;BT believes that the...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Jason Stamper</name>
        <uri>http://www.cbronline.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.businessreviewonline.com/blog/">
        <![CDATA[<p>The British government's plans for providing fast broadband internet connection to each and every British household by 2012 -- in part by extending mobile broadband licenses to incumbent mobile operators -- have caused some concern at BT. BT said yesterday it could even take legal action against the government if it goes ahead with its plans.</p>

<p>BT sent a "letter before action" to the business secretary Lord Mandelson, in which the company took issue with the idea that the available wireless spectrum licenses be extended to incumbent mobile operators without a spectrum auction.</p>

<p>A spokesperson explained: "BT believes that the proposals gift large value of spectrum to the incumbent mobile operators without any real provision to promote new entry or competition.  Extending the 3G licences (twelve years before they expire) without a full auction is a large subsidy to mobile operators, at the expense of the tax payer, and is unfair to other investors in the communications market."</p>

<p>The representative continued, "The proposed spectrum caps risk a carving up of new and existing spectrum between the existing mobile operators with no real provision for new entry. BT believes that a full and open consultation should be held on these proposals and will press for significant changes to be made in order to address the areas of concern."</p>

<p>The representative went on to say that BT is calling for the contracts to be auctioned off in a way that stimulates competition in the market for both existing operators and new entrants. </p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Merry Christmas!</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.businessreviewonline.com/blog/archives/2009/12/#002057" />    


    <updated>2009-12-24T17:27:59Z</updated>

    <summary>Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year to all our readers, from the editorial team at CBR. We&apos;ve got lots of exciting plans for 2010, including a website refresh, a brand new CBR VIP Panel to help us keep our coverage grounded in reality and take the pulse of the IT community, CBR Awards and much more. So we hope to see you again next year! Happy holidays, Jason Stamper, CBR editor....</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Jason Stamper</name>
        <uri>http://www.cbronline.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.businessreviewonline.com/blog/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year to all our readers, from the editorial team at CBR.</p>

<p>We've got lots of exciting plans for 2010, including a website refresh, a brand new CBR VIP Panel to help us keep our coverage grounded in reality and take the pulse of the IT community, CBR Awards and much more.</p>

<p>So we hope to see you again next year!</p>

<p>Happy holidays,<br />
Jason Stamper, CBR editor.</p>

<p><img alt="reindeer.jpg" src="http://www.businessreviewonline.com/blog/reindeer.jpg" width="256" height="192" class="mt-image-none" style="" /></p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title></title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.businessreviewonline.com/blog/archives/2009/12/#002056" />    


    <updated>2009-12-24T17:17:00Z</updated>

    <summary></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Jason Stamper</name>
        <uri>http://www.cbronline.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.businessreviewonline.com/blog/">
        
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Compuware extends user experience testing to mobiles</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.businessreviewonline.com/blog/archives/2009/12/#001559" />    


    <updated>2009-12-11T16:54:14Z</updated>

    <summary>This week application management and testing player Compuware announced Vantage for Mobile, which it says could help mobile operators increase their own profitability by helping them monitor and enhance the end user experience. Speaking to CBR, Ian Clarke, director of telecoms at Compuware, said that this is a technology that mobile operators have been seeking for some time: &quot;We have spoken to over 20 operators in the last six months, and they confirmed that they have not solved the problem of gaining visibility into what mobile users are actually seeing,&quot; he said. &quot;Companies need that visibility if they are to...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Jason Stamper</name>
        <uri>http://www.cbronline.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    <category term="mobilecomputing" label="Mobile Computing" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="mobilenetworkoperator" label="Mobile network operator" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="telecommunication" label="Telecommunication" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.businessreviewonline.com/blog/">
        <![CDATA[<p>This week application management and testing player Compuware announced Vantage for Mobile, which it says could help mobile operators increase their own profitability by helping them monitor and enhance the end user experience.</p>

<p>Speaking to CBR, Ian Clarke, director of telecoms at Compuware, said that this is a technology that mobile operators have been seeking for some time: "We have spoken to over 20 operators in the last six months, and they confirmed that they have not solved the problem of gaining visibility into what mobile users are actually seeing," he said.</p>

<p>"Companies need that visibility if they are to deliver real value and additional services," added Jerry Witkowicz, Compuware product manager for Vantage for Mobile.</p>

<p>Clarke said that Vantage for Mobile enables mobile operators to quickly see what is hampering end user experience - whether it is the device, the network they are using, the Internet itself or indeed the mobile operators' applications. "Not all the performance issues are related to the mobile operator necessarily," said Clarke. </p>

<p>"This technology enables those operators to see where a problem might lie, which is just as important if it is a performance issue that is outside their own scope, like the device or the Internet itself, because that is information they can then share with those customers having difficulties," Clarke said.</p>

<p>Clarke said that the pricing of the technology is based on how many subscribers a mobile operator has. He claimed that two thirds of those 22 mobile operators that Compuware polled about their mobile user experience monitoring capabilities are "actively engaged" in discussions with a view to buying into the Compuware Vantage for Mobile technology.</p>

<p>Asked whether it is possible that some mobile operators will expose the information provided by Vantage for Mobile to their customers, Witkowicz said, "Absolutely. Many of those mobile operators are wanting to do exactly that as a value added service for subscribers, so we will be enabling them to share some or all of the information gathered by Vantage for Mobile with those subscribers."</p>

<p>For more on this news see our CBR news story <A href="http://mobility.cbronline.com/news/compuware_launches_vantage_for_mobile_to_increase_subscriber_visibility_081209">here</A>.</p>

<p><br />
<DIV class=zemanta-pixie style="MARGIN-TOP: 10px; HEIGHT: 15px"><A class=zemanta-pixie-a title="Reblog this post [with Zemanta]" href="http://reblog.zemanta.com/zemified/f9b0b1ba-ca7a-4576-94b3-c76f9d42b42f/"><IMG class=zemanta-pixie-img style="BORDER-RIGHT: medium none; BORDER-TOP: medium none; FLOAT: right; BORDER-LEFT: medium none; BORDER-BOTTOM: medium none" alt="Reblog this post [with Zemanta]" src="http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=f9b0b1ba-ca7a-4576-94b3-c76f9d42b42f"></A><SPAN class="zem-script more-related pretty-attribution"><SCRIPT src="http://static.zemanta.com/readside/loader.js" defer="defer" type="text/javascript"></SCRIPT></SPAN></DIV></p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Most influential of the decade? Vote now!</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.businessreviewonline.com/blog/archives/2009/12/#001541" />    


    <updated>2009-12-08T13:20:34Z</updated>

    <summary>We&apos;re compiling an article on the most influential technologists of the decade, and we&apos;d like to know who you think should walk away with top honours. We&apos;ve compiled a shortlist of over 20 for you to choose from, but you can also add your own choice at the bottom of the survey if you think we&apos;ve missed someone crucial. It will only take you a moment and we&apos;d be very grateful to have your vote. You may simply want to see who&apos;s made it onto our shortlist. Either way, please click here to complete the quick survey. Thanks! Jason...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Jason Stamper</name>
        <uri>http://www.cbronline.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.businessreviewonline.com/blog/">
        <![CDATA[<p>We're compiling an article on the most influential technologists of the decade, and we'd like to know who you think should walk away with top honours.</p>

<p>We've compiled a shortlist of over 20 for you to choose from, but you can also add your own choice at the bottom of the survey if you think we've missed someone crucial.</p>

<p>It will only take you a moment and we'd be very grateful to have your vote. You may simply want to see who's made it onto our shortlist. Either way, please click <a href="http://www.surveymonkey.com/s/SQK7GZY">here </a>to complete the quick survey.</p>

<p>Thanks!<br />
Jason</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

</feed>

