- Latest News
- Comment & Metrics
- Magazine Articles
- Jason Stamper's Blog
- Open Source Blog
- Newsletter Sign-Up
- Hoy or Adlington on a laptop lid? More likely than you might think...
- 10 best technologies to beat the downturn
- Trend Micro buries the hatchet
- Should you look at GAAP or non-GAAP?
- Getting off (on) the Cloud
- Getting off the Cloud
- HDS tapping UK storage demand
- SAP's support price rise has industry in a quandary
- IBM’s Ilog buy is a “non event” says rival
- Who’s fitter: drummers or footballers? Phil Collins vs. Ronaldo!
- Do Macs now rule the US desktop market?
- UK shops selling out of iPhone 3Gs
- Why did Tucci oust VMware's Diane Greene?
- The difference between ‘cloud computing’ and SaaS? None whatsoever.
- Iona bought by Progress Software
- Last few days of Windows XP sales...
- Lombardi talks on-demand BPM
- Lessons in ‘Enterprise 2.0’. Lesson 1: don't mention Enterprise 2.0.
- 10 ways to cut software development costs
- Would the baddest Roadrunner please step forward
- Artist's impression of new 3G Apple iPhone revealed
- Enterprise 2.0 Conference off to Web 2.0-style start
- CBR Dining Club speaker named EMEA analyst of the year!
- Numara claims service desk management rivals are "going backwards"
- Sinequa says Microsoft buying Fast is a boon
- ASG On Verge of Massive BSM Acquisition
- Compuware 2.0? Led Zeppelin? Am I dreaming?
- 100 most influential tech vendors: you have to be kidding
- BlackBerry Bold: RIM’s iPhone killer?
Jason Stamper's Blog
De-dupe becoming part of storage fabric?
April 23, 2008
When I met Brian Biles, co-founder and VP product management of storage de-duplication vendor Data Domain a few weeks back, I asked how long it will be before de-duplication technologies simply become part of workaday storage arrays.
“Long term, de-dupe is likely to become a storage fundamental, for all areas of storage,” Biles told me. It may be sooner than that...
IBM announced last week that it is buying Diligent Technologies, a privately held storage de-duplication technology company headquartered in Massachusetts with research and development in Tel Aviv, Israel.
Diligent's technologies and employees will become part of the IBM System Storage business unit of the IBM Systems and Technology Group.
“Diligent develops in-line data de-duplication software that is integrated with server and storage infrastructures to help organizations significantly reduce the amount and cost of physical storage required in data centres,” said Big Blue. “Enterprise and mid-sized organizations are faced with data centres that are reaching a breaking point of complexity and manageability, while at the same time experiencing explosive demands for storage for new data, transactions, email and back-up files.”
As companies continue to struggle with their exploding volumes of data, they are looking for ways of increasing storage density without buying additional capacity. De-duplication is one way of doing that, and the big storage vendors want a piece of the action.
“The Diligent acquisition will be an important part of IBM's New Enterprise Data Center model, which helps clients improve IT efficiency and facilitates the rapid deployment of new IT services for future business growth,” said IBM. “The new model is based on best practices for virtualization, green IT, service management and cloud computing.”
IBM is not yet saying that it will include de-duplication technologies free when it sells storage, but as competition in the storage space evolves, there’s bound to be pressure on standalone de-duplication vendors, Data Domain included. Further consolidation is on the cards, in my view.
I’d liken it to the ability to store objects in relational databases: at one time there were numerous firms making a living doing object-oriented databases before the relational database firms developed their own or acquired similar capabilities. And what became of the object-oriented firms like Objectivity, Versant, ODI and ObjectStore?
Comments
ODI (developer of ObjectStore) was taken over by Progress Software. Objectivity and Versant are alive and well. Objectivity has just announced record profits for the Quarter.
[Jason Stamper comments: thanks for the comment Leon. As you say they are still around, but how big is their market? Objectivity is doing so well that it doesn't say anywhere in the release what its total revenue is, just that its revenue is 'growing'. Versant is public so it must disclose revenue: $6.3m in its latest quarter. There's nothing wrong with being a small company making small profits. My point was that those companies saw much of their unique differentiator absorbed into the technology of the giants of the database world, which is why Versant made $6.3m in the quarter, and not $63m, or $630m. I don't think Data Domain is aspiring to get to the stage where it makes just $6.3m a quarter.]
Post a comment
back to top