RECENT ARTICLES

Jason Stamper's Blog

Market share leader in Gartner Magic Quadrant shock
December 21, 2006

Disclaimer sort of thing: The magazine I edit, Computer Business Review, is owned by Datamonitor, Europe’s largest analyst firm, and one recently selected as a Business Superbrand (read more on that here). If you didn’t know, Datamonitor not long ago bought analyst firm the Butler Group and in the past few months, research house Ovum too.

As a technology magazine editor I try and retain a sense of independence about various research houses, despite my obvious allegiance to Datamonitor. I am assuming that my magazine and indeed blog’s readers are interested in the views of not only Datamonitor, Butler and Ovum, but others too: some having specialised in different areas.

I also know that rival analyst firms like Gartner often produce interesting research. I have interviewed several Gartner people, like Roy Shulte, the most senior middleware analyst over there so far as I know, and Jim Sinur, a Gartner VP and distinguished analyst who covers BPM, business rules and all that jazz.

So perhaps I can only blame EMC for the press release that just landed in my inbox, with the headline: “Top analyst firm positions EMC in ‘leaders’ quadrant for midrange enterprise disk arrays.”


The most obvious point to make is that EMC is one of the clear market leaders if not the market leader in midrange disk thanks to its Clariion (first engineered by Tom West -- brains behind Data General’s servers and storage -- and which Dell successfully resells by the truck-load) and Celerra product lines.

So why does it need Gartner, indeed any analyst’s visual market mapping marketing to reassure customers that it is a heavy hitter? To me this is like saying, “Nike in ‘leaders’ quadrant for casual or sports-specific athletic shoes.”

To make matters worse, thanks to the ‘litigation-happy’ nature of corporate America, Gartner feels the need to include a disclaimer at the end of any press releases that discuss its Magic Quadrants, which includes the line: “The Magic Quadrant… depicts Gartner’s analysis of how certain vendors measure against criteria for that Marketplace, as defined by Gartner. Gartner does not endorse any vendor, product or service depicted in the Magic Quadrant and does not advise technology users to select only those vendors placed in the ‘Leaders’ quadrant.”

If you take that disclaimer literally – and don’t take this personally EMC – being in the leaders quadrant ‘doesn’t mean shit’ (as I’ve heard characters on CSI and the like exclaim). You shouldn’t only buy from players in that quadrant, Gartner says, so what should you do? Do your own due diligence based on your specific wants and needs of course, or get Gartner or another analyst or consultancy firm to do it for you.

But if that’s the case, why trumpet the fact you are in the leaders quadrant in the first place, if you are already clearly among the market share leaders? Surely the only vendors who would want to trumpet the fact they are in the leaders quadrant would be smaller players chuffed to be put in that top right-hand corner of the chart, despite the fact they are currently losing out to rivals whose names should have been in the leaders quadrant in their place?

Don’t get me wrong – all analysis methodologies have their drawbacks. I’m just surprised EMC saw the value in the release. Then again, it is a rather slow news day being just one working day before Christmas for most of us, so you never know which journalists might have enough time on their hands to write it up. Damn – they got me.


Digg this

  Email this entry to a friend

Posted by Jason Stamper on December 21, 2006 04:12 PM

Comments

Post a comment

Name:

Email Address:

URL:

Remember Me?    Yes     No 

Comments: